issue_comments
2,724 rows where user = 2448579 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- dcherian · 2,724 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1577838062 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7888#issuecomment-1577838062 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7888 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85eC-Xu | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-06-06T03:20:39Z | 2023-06-06T03:20:39Z | MEMBER | Should we delete the cfgrib example instead? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add cfgrib,ipywidgets to doc env 1736542260 | |
1577827466 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7841#issuecomment-1577827466 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7841 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85eC7yK | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-06-06T03:05:47Z | 2023-06-06T03:05:47Z | MEMBER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray docs showing tracebacks instead of plots 1709215291 | ||
1577474914 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7894#issuecomment-1577474914 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7894 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85eBlti | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-06-05T21:05:47Z | 2023-06-05T21:05:57Z | MEMBER |
@chfite Can you provide an example of what you would want it to do please |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Can a "skipna" argument be added for Dataset.integrate() and DataArray.integrate()? 1742035781 | |
1574365471 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7890#issuecomment-1574365471 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7890 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85d1ukf | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-06-02T22:04:33Z | 2023-06-02T22:04:33Z | MEMBER | I think the only other one is dask, which should also work. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`xarray.rolling_window` Converts `dims` Argument from Tuple to List Causing Issues for Cupy-Xarray 1738835134 | |
1574331034 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7890#issuecomment-1574331034 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7890 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85d1mKa | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-06-02T21:23:25Z | 2023-06-02T21:27:06Z | MEMBER | This seems like a real easy fix?
EDIT: the Array API seems to type |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`xarray.rolling_window` Converts `dims` Argument from Tuple to List Causing Issues for Cupy-Xarray 1738835134 | |
1574264842 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7862#issuecomment-1574264842 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7862 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85d1WAK | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-06-02T20:14:33Z | 2023-06-02T20:14:48Z | MEMBER |
cc @Illviljan @headtr1ck |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
CF encoding should preserve vlen dtype for empty arrays 1720045908 | |
1572306481 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7883#issuecomment-1572306481 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7883 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85dt34x | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-06-01T15:49:42Z | 2023-06-01T15:49:42Z | MEMBER | Hmmm ndim is in the array api so potentially we could just update the test. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Avoid one call to len when getting ndim of Variables 1731320789 | |
1572276996 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7884#issuecomment-1572276996 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7884 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85dtwsE | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-06-01T15:30:26Z | 2023-06-01T15:30:26Z | MEMBER | Please ask over at the cfgrib repo. But it does look like a bad environment / bad install. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Reading .grib files with xarray 1732510720 | |
1561173824 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5644#issuecomment-1561173824 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5644 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85dDZ9A | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-24T13:39:30Z | 2023-05-24T13:39:30Z | MEMBER | Do you know where the in-place modification is happening? We could just copy there and fix this particular issue. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`polyfit` with weights alters the DataArray in place 955043280 | |
1560225308 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7865#issuecomment-1560225308 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7865 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85c_yYc | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-23T22:49:14Z | 2023-05-23T22:49:14Z | MEMBER | Thanks @martinfleis this is a very valuable contribution to the ecosystem! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Upload nightly wheels to scientific-python-nightly-wheels 1720850091 | |
1553390072 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7019#issuecomment-1553390072 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7019 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cltn4 | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-18T17:34:01Z | 2023-05-18T17:34:01Z | MEMBER | Thanks @TomNicholas Big change! |
{ "total_count": 3, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 3, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Generalize handling of chunked array types 1368740629 | |
1551638978 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1551638978 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cfCHC | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-17T15:45:41Z | 2023-05-17T15:45:41Z | MEMBER | Thanks @maxhollmann I pushed a test for #2377. I see this is your first contribution to Xarray. Welcome! #1792 would be a nice contribution if you're looking for more to do ;) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray 1685422501 | |
1550594808 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7841#issuecomment-1550594808 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7841 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cbDL4 | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-17T02:24:57Z | 2023-05-17T02:24:57Z | MEMBER | We should migrate these to rioxarray if they aren't there already. cc @snowman2 @scottyhq @JessicaS11 |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Xarray docs showing tracebacks instead of plots 1709215291 | |
1550187275 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1550187275 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cZfsL | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-16T18:47:27Z | 2023-05-16T18:47:27Z | MEMBER | Thanks @maxhollmann can you add a note to |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray 1685422501 | |
1546024198 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7838#issuecomment-1546024198 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7838 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cJnUG | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-12T16:52:29Z | 2023-05-12T16:52:29Z | MEMBER | Thanks! I tracked this down to the difference between reading the file remotely, or downloading first and accessing a local copy on v0.20.2 (the latter is what I used to produce my figures). Can you reproduce?
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Anomaly calculation with groupby leaves seasonal cycle 1706864252 | |
1545974461 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7796#issuecomment-1545974461 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7796 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cJbK9 | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-12T16:09:04Z | 2023-05-12T16:09:14Z | MEMBER | Yes, 10-30% on my machine:
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 1, "eyes": 0 } |
Speed up .dt accessor by preserving Index objects. 1689364566 | |
1545939343 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7788#issuecomment-1545939343 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7788 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cJSmP | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-12T15:39:24Z | 2023-05-12T15:39:24Z | MEMBER | I defer to @shoyer, the solution with |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix as_compatible_data for read-only np.ma.MaskedArray 1685422501 | |
1545930953 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7838#issuecomment-1545930953 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7838 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85cJQjJ | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-12T15:32:47Z | 2023-05-12T15:35:02Z | MEMBER | Can you compare v0.20.2:v2022.03.0:v2023.04.2 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Anomaly calculation with groupby leaves seasonal cycle 1706864252 | |
1542465745 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4412#issuecomment-1542465745 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4412 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85b8CjR | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-10T16:06:26Z | 2023-05-10T16:06:54Z | MEMBER | Related request for This came up in the discussion today. cc @tom-white @kmuehlbauer |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Dataset.encode_cf function 696047530 | |
1540816942 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7831#issuecomment-1540816942 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7831 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85b1wAu | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-09T20:02:27Z | 2023-05-09T20:02:27Z | MEMBER | I was suggesting to special-case rioxarray only just because we recently deleted the rasterio backend, and that might ease the transition. Can we do it at the top-level open-dataset when |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Can't open datasets with the `rasterio` engine. 1702025553 | |
1540435470 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7831#issuecomment-1540435470 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7831 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85b0S4O | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-09T15:44:55Z | 2023-05-09T15:44:55Z | MEMBER | I think this would be nice since we recently removed the rasterio backend. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Can't open datasets with the `rasterio` engine. 1702025553 | |
1538808220 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7825#issuecomment-1538808220 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7825 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85buFmc | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-08T18:03:58Z | 2023-05-08T18:03:58Z | MEMBER | LGTM. Thanks! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test: Fix test_write_read_select_write for Zarr V3 1699112787 | |
1537031554 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7817#issuecomment-1537031554 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7817 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bnT2C | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-06T03:23:13Z | 2023-05-06T03:23:13Z | MEMBER |
Can we reverse the order so that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
nanosecond precision lost when reading time data 1696097756 | |
1534000660 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7814#issuecomment-1534000660 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7814 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bbv4U | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-04T02:35:39Z | 2023-05-04T02:35:39Z | MEMBER | We;ll need a reproducible example |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not callable when joining netCDF files. Works when ran interactively. 1695028906 | |
1531721493 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7795#issuecomment-1531721493 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7795 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bTDcV | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-02T15:56:48Z | 2023-05-02T15:56:48Z | MEMBER | Thanks @Illviljan I'm merging so I can run benchmarks on a few other PRs |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
[skip-ci] Add cftime groupby, resample benchmarks 1688781350 | |
1530439461 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7795#issuecomment-1530439461 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7795 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bOKcl | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-01T22:23:53Z | 2023-05-01T22:23:53Z | MEMBER | well that was it apparently 🤷🏾♂️ |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
[skip-ci] Add cftime groupby, resample benchmarks 1688781350 | |
1530417559 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7795#issuecomment-1530417559 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7795 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bOFGX | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-01T22:13:03Z | 2023-05-01T22:13:03Z | MEMBER |
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
[skip-ci] Add cftime groupby, resample benchmarks 1688781350 | |
1530367137 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7795#issuecomment-1530367137 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7795 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bN4yh | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-01T21:53:34Z | 2023-05-01T21:53:34Z | MEMBER | Here's a truncated diff: ``` 5c5 < Job is about to start running on the hosted runner: GitHub Actions 2 (hosted)
``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
[skip-ci] Add cftime groupby, resample benchmarks 1688781350 | |
1530349371 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7795#issuecomment-1530349371 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7795 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bN0c7 | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-01T21:44:08Z | 2023-05-01T21:44:08Z | MEMBER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
[skip-ci] Add cftime groupby, resample benchmarks 1688781350 | ||
1529882778 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7795#issuecomment-1529882778 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7795 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bMCia | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-01T16:01:59Z | 2023-05-01T16:01:59Z | MEMBER | I'm not sure why asv can't create the env for benchmarking. ``` + echo 'Baseline: 25d9a28e12141b9b5e4a79454eb76ddd2ee2bc4d (pydata:main)' ram [7110632]: Baseline: 25d9a28e12141b9b5e4a79454eb76ddd2ee2bc4d (pydata:main) + echo 'Contender: 4ca69efdf7e5e3fc661e5ec3ae618d102a374f32 (dcherian:bench-cftime-groupby)' Contender: 4ca69efdf7e5e3fc661e5ec3ae618d102a374f32 (dcherian:bench-cftime-groupby) ++ which conda + export CONDA_EXE=/usr/bin/conda + CONDA_EXE=/usr/bin/conda + ASV_OPTIONS='--split --show-stderr --factor 1.5' + asv continuous --split --show-stderr --factor 1.5 25d9a28e12141b9b5e4a79454eb76ddd2ee2bc4d 4ca69efdf7e5e3fc661e5ec3ae618d102a374f32 + tee benchmarks.log + sed '/Traceback \|failed$\|PERFORMANCE DECREASED/ s/^/::error::/' Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/bin/asv", line 10, in <module> sys.exit(main()) File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/lib/python3.10/site-packages/asv/main.py", line 38, in main result = args.func(args) File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/lib/python3.10/site-packages/asv/commands/init.py", line 49, in run_from_args return cls.run_from_conf_args(conf, args) File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/lib/python3.10/site-packages/asv/commands/continuous.py", line 75, in run_from_conf_args return cls.run( File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/lib/python3.10/site-packages/asv/commands/continuous.py", line 114, in run result = Run.run( File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/lib/python3.10/site-packages/asv/commands/run.py", line 294, in run Setup.perform_setup(environments, parallel=parallel) File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/lib/python3.10/site-packages/asv/commands/setup.py", line 89, in perform_setup list(map(_create, environments)) File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/lib/python3.10/site-packages/asv/commands/setup.py", line 21, in _create env.create() File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/lib/python3.10/site-packages/asv/environment.py", line 704, in create self._setup() File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/lib/python3.10/site-packages/asv/plugins/conda.py", line 174, in _setup self._run_conda(['env', 'create', '-f', env_file_name, File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/lib/python3.10/site-packages/asv/plugins/conda.py", line 227, in _run_conda return util.check_output([conda] + args, env=env) File "/home/runner/micromamba-root/envs/xarray-tests/lib/python3.10/site-packages/asv/util.py", line 754, in check_output raise ProcessError(args, retcode, stdout, stderr) asv.util.ProcessError: Command '/usr/bin/conda env create -f /tmp/tmphnyugp42.yml -p /home/runner/work/xarray/xarray/asv_bench/.asv/env/df282ba4a530a0853b7f9108ec3ff02d --force' returned non-zero exit status 1 · Creating environments ·· Error running /usr/bin/conda env create -f /tmp/tmphnyugp42.yml -p /home/runner/work/xarray/xarray/asv_bench/.asv/env/df282ba4a530a0853b7f9108ec3ff02d --force (exit status 1) STDOUT --------> STDERR --------> SpecNotFound: /tmp/tmphnyugp42.yml is not a valid yaml file. ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
[skip-ci] Add cftime groupby, resample benchmarks 1688781350 | |
1529877407 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7799#issuecomment-1529877407 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7799 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bMBOf | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-05-01T16:00:25Z | 2023-05-01T16:00:25Z | MEMBER | In general I think it would be fine to merge incremental changes. It may be good to schedule a quick 30 minute chat to sync up ideas here. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Start making unit testing more general 1690019325 | |
1528934982 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7797#issuecomment-1528934982 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7797 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bIbJG | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-30T04:15:09Z | 2023-04-30T04:15:29Z | MEMBER |
Nice, we test Is it possible for you to run nightly tests against xarray's main branch? That would help a lot. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
More `groupby` indexing problems 1689655334 | |
1528597777 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3267#issuecomment-1528597777 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3267 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bHI0R | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-29T03:30:20Z | 2023-04-29T03:30:20Z | MEMBER | Should be better now with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Resample excecution time is significantly longer in version 0.12 than 0.11 485508509 | |
1528072972 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7790#issuecomment-1528072972 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7790 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bFIsM | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-28T20:43:44Z | 2023-04-28T20:43:44Z | MEMBER | { "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fill values in time arrays (numpy.datetime64) are lost in zarr 1685803922 | ||
1527657759 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7635#issuecomment-1527657759 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7635 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bDjUf | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-28T14:29:52Z | 2023-04-28T14:31:39Z | MEMBER | Thanks for your patience here @dsgreen2 . This is a nice contribution. Welcome to Xarray! |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement DataArray.to_dask_dataframe() 1627298527 | |
1527652802 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7713#issuecomment-1527652802 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7713 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bDiHC | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-28T14:26:15Z | 2023-04-28T14:26:32Z | MEMBER | This is a duplicate of https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4404 It seems like this is for MultiIndex support. A better error message and documentation would be a great contribution! Let's move the conversation there |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`Variable/IndexVariable` do not accept a tuple for data. 1652227927 | |
1527648649 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7739#issuecomment-1527648649 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7739 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bDhGJ | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-28T14:22:58Z | 2023-04-28T14:22:58Z | MEMBER | Thanks @jmccreight great work! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`ds.to_dict` with data as arrays, not lists 1659078413 | |
1527647415 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7741#issuecomment-1527647415 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7741 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85bDgy3 | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-28T14:22:02Z | 2023-04-28T14:22:02Z | MEMBER | Thanks @abrammer very nice work! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add lshift and rshift operators 1659654612 | |
1526241680 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7764#issuecomment-1526241680 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7764 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85a-JmQ | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-27T19:26:13Z | 2023-04-27T19:26:13Z | MEMBER | I think I agree with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support opt_einsum in xr.dot 1672288892 | |
1526240154 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7764#issuecomment-1526240154 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7764 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85a-JOa | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-27T19:25:29Z | 2023-04-27T19:25:29Z | MEMBER |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Support opt_einsum in xr.dot 1672288892 | |
1526224630 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7790#issuecomment-1526224630 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7790 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85a-Fb2 | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-27T19:18:12Z | 2023-04-27T19:18:12Z | MEMBER | I think the issue is that we're always running "CF encoding" which is more appropriate for netCDF4 than Zarr, since Zarr supports datetime64 natively. And currently there's no way to control whether the datetime encoder is applied or not, we just look at the dtype: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/0f4e99d036b0d6d76a3271e6191eacbc9922662f/xarray/coding/times.py#L697-L704 I think the right way to fix this is to allow the user to run the |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fill values in time arrays (numpy.datetime64) are lost in zarr 1685803922 | |
1523666774 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6610#issuecomment-1523666774 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6610 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85a0U9W | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-26T15:59:06Z | 2023-04-26T16:06:17Z | MEMBER | We voted to move forward with this API:
We won't break backwards-compatibility for |
{ "total_count": 4, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 1, "eyes": 1 } |
Update GroupBy constructor for grouping by multiple variables, dask arrays 1236174701 | |
1523670253 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7787#issuecomment-1523670253 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7787 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85a0Vzt | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-26T16:01:16Z | 2023-04-26T16:01:16Z | MEMBER | :+1: from me! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow the label run-upstream to run upstream CI 1684281101 | |
1523669010 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7561#issuecomment-1523669010 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7561 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85a0VgS | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-26T16:00:32Z | 2023-04-26T16:00:32Z | MEMBER | I'd like to merge this soon. It's an internal refactor with no public API changes. I think we can expose the Grouper objects publicly in a new PR |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Introduce Grouper objects internally 1600382587 | |
1498463195 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6610#issuecomment-1498463195 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6610 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZULvb | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-06T04:07:05Z | 2023-04-26T15:52:21Z | MEMBER | Here's a question. In #7561, I implement
Does this look OK or do we want to support passing the DataArray or variable name as a This syntax would support passing PS: Pandas has a
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Update GroupBy constructor for grouping by multiple variables, dask arrays 1236174701 | |
1523618985 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7782#issuecomment-1523618985 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7782 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85a0JSp | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-26T15:29:14Z | 2023-04-26T15:29:14Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the in-depth investigation!
Do we know why this is so?
:+1: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.open_dataset() reading ubyte variables as float32 from DAP server 1681353195 | |
1523589353 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7786#issuecomment-1523589353 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7786 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85a0CDp | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-26T15:10:44Z | 2023-04-26T15:10:44Z | MEMBER | Thanks @ksunden |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use canonical name for set_horizonalalignment over alias set_ha 1683839855 | |
1521951732 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7785#issuecomment-1521951732 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7785 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85atyP0 | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-25T15:03:39Z | 2023-04-25T15:03:39Z | MEMBER | Thanks we use this file only for Githubs dependency graph, which now supports |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove pandas<2 pin 1683335751 | |
1521798719 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7650#issuecomment-1521798719 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7650 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85atM4_ | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-25T13:32:43Z | 2023-04-25T13:32:43Z | MEMBER | Yes you should be good on 2023.04.2 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Pin pandas < 2 1632422255 | |
1520550980 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7782#issuecomment-1520550980 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7782 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aocRE | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-24T17:18:37Z | 2023-04-24T19:55:11Z | MEMBER |
The current approach seeems OK no? It seems like the bug is that
EDIT: I mean that each coder checks whether it is applicable, so we already do that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.open_dataset() reading ubyte variables as float32 from DAP server 1681353195 | |
1520434316 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7782#issuecomment-1520434316 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7782 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85an_yM | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-24T15:55:48Z | 2023-04-24T15:55:48Z | MEMBER |
Do these two have to be linked? I wonder if we can handle the filling later : https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/2657787f76fffe4395288702403a68212e69234b/xarray/coding/variables.py#L397-L407 It seems like this code is setting fill values to the right type for CFMaskCoder which is the next step |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.open_dataset() reading ubyte variables as float32 from DAP server 1681353195 | |
1518429926 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7772#issuecomment-1518429926 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7772 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85agWbm | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-21T23:56:26Z | 2023-04-21T23:56:26Z | MEMBER | I cannot reproduce this on ``` (xarray-tests) 17:55:11 [cgdm-caguas] {~/python/xarray/devel} ──────> python lazy-nbytes.py 8582842640 Filename: /Users/dcherian/work/python/xarray/devel/lazy-nbytes.py Line # Mem usage Increment Occurrences Line Contents
``` The BackendArray types define |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Process getting killed due to high memory consumption of xarray's nbytes method 1676561243 | |
1516738260 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7758#issuecomment-1516738260 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7758 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aZ5bU | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-20T18:03:48Z | 2023-04-20T18:03:48Z | MEMBER | We already have this: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/a4c54a3b1085d7d8ab900f9a645439270327d2c3/xarray/backends/netCDF4_.py#L102-L106 but you're right I don't think its configurable.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Provide a way to specify how long open_dataset tries to fetch data before timing out 1668898601 | |
1516642402 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7773#issuecomment-1516642402 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7773 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aZiBi | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-20T16:44:51Z | 2023-04-20T16:44:51Z | MEMBER | Can you try with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
opendap access fails only in ubuntu machines 1676792648 | |
1516635276 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7769#issuecomment-1516635276 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7769 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aZgSM | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-20T16:38:41Z | 2023-04-20T16:38:41Z | MEMBER | Thanks @gsieros, and apologies for the trouble. Clearly our test suite was insufficient. I'll push out a release soon. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix groupby_bins when labels are specified 1675073096 | |
1515134832 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7770#issuecomment-1515134832 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7770 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aTx9w | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-19T17:49:36Z | 2023-04-19T17:49:36Z | MEMBER | You should be using entrypoints: - https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/internals/how-to-add-new-backend.html - https://tutorial.xarray.dev/advanced/backends/backends.html |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Provide a public API for adding new backends 1675299031 | |
1514762927 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7739#issuecomment-1514762927 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7739 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aSXKv | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-19T13:44:10Z | 2023-04-19T13:44:10Z | MEMBER |
Oh yeah, I like this. Only suggestion is |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`ds.to_dict` with data as arrays, not lists 1659078413 | |
1514043756 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7669#issuecomment-1514043756 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7669 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aPnls | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-19T02:26:30Z | 2023-04-19T02:26:30Z | MEMBER | Thanks @remigathoni great PR! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Docstrings examples for string methods 1639361476 | |
1513871216 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7698#issuecomment-1513871216 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7698 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aO9dw | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-18T22:36:29Z | 2023-04-18T22:36:29Z | MEMBER |
Not sure about the details here. I think it would be good to discuss in an issue before proceeding |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use read1 instead of read to get magic number 1646350377 | |
1513865565 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7739#issuecomment-1513865565 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7739 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aO8Fd | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-18T22:28:07Z | 2023-04-18T22:28:07Z | MEMBER | Copying my comment from https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1599#issuecomment-1504276696
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`ds.to_dict` with data as arrays, not lists 1659078413 | |
1513849818 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7753#issuecomment-1513849818 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7753 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aO4Pa | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-18T22:08:50Z | 2023-04-18T22:08:50Z | MEMBER |
I think that's the default
Yeah but its a little flaky: https://labs.quansight.org/blog/github-actions-benchmarks so the noise might not be worth it |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add benchmark against latest release on main. 1666853925 | |
1511781870 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7759#issuecomment-1511781870 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7759 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85aG_Xu | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-17T17:25:17Z | 2023-04-17T17:25:17Z | MEMBER | Ouch, thanks for finding and report this bad bug! We'll issue a bugfix release soon. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
groupby_bins returns data in reversed order 1670415238 | |
1507391665 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7716#issuecomment-1507391665 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7716 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Z2Pix | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-13T17:56:33Z | 2023-04-13T17:56:33Z | MEMBER | Should be fixed with the various repodata patches |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
bad conda solve with pandas 2 1654022522 | |
1507213204 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4325#issuecomment-1507213204 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4325 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Z1j-U | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-13T15:56:51Z | 2023-04-13T15:56:51Z | MEMBER | Over in https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7344#issuecomment-1336299057 @shoyer
After some digging, this would involve using "summed area tables" which have been generalized to nD, and can be used to compute all our built-in reductions (except median). Basically we'd store the summed area table (repeated This would be an intermediate level project but we could implement it incrementally (start with cc @aulemahal |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Optimize ndrolling nanreduce 675482176 | |
1507198725 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4915#issuecomment-1507198725 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4915 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Z1gcF | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-13T15:46:18Z | 2023-04-13T15:46:18Z | MEMBER | Can you copy your comment to #4325 please? |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Better rolling reductions 809366777 | |
1507126565 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7681#issuecomment-1507126565 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7681 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Z1O0l | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-13T14:59:41Z | 2023-04-13T14:59:41Z | MEMBER | Thanks @harshitha1201 ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
restructure the contributing guide 1641188400 | |
1507124290 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7731#issuecomment-1507124290 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7731 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Z1ORC | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-13T14:58:20Z | 2023-04-13T14:58:20Z | MEMBER | Thanks for patiently working through this Spencer. I'll merge now, and then we can release tomorrow. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Continue to use nanosecond-precision Timestamps in precision-sensitive areas 1657396474 | |
1506285455 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7731#issuecomment-1506285455 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7731 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZyBeP | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-13T03:35:01Z | 2023-04-13T03:35:01Z | MEMBER | There are a bunch of warnings in the tests that could be silenced:
But we can also just merge quickly to get a release out |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Continue to use nanosecond-precision Timestamps in precision-sensitive areas 1657396474 | |
1505834246 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7751#issuecomment-1505834246 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7751 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZwTUG | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-12T19:49:28Z | 2023-04-12T19:49:28Z | MEMBER | nice! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
minor doc updates to clarify extensions using accessors 1664888324 | |
1505584866 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4915#issuecomment-1505584866 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4915 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZvWbi | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-12T16:34:55Z | 2023-04-12T16:34:55Z | MEMBER | We would welcome a PR. Looking at the implementation of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Better rolling reductions 809366777 | |
1505403088 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7730#issuecomment-1505403088 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7730 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZuqDQ | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-12T14:43:15Z | 2023-04-12T14:43:15Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the report! I think we should add your example as a benchmark. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
flox performance regression for cftime resampling 1657036222 | |
1505399396 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7731#issuecomment-1505399396 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7731 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZupJk | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-12T14:41:02Z | 2023-04-12T14:41:17Z | MEMBER | RTD failures are real:
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Continue to use nanosecond-precision Timestamps in precision-sensitive areas 1657396474 | |
1504276696 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1599#issuecomment-1504276696 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1599 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZqXDY | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-11T23:43:34Z | 2023-04-11T23:43:43Z | MEMBER | Perhaps we should have Then the user could do |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArray to_dict() without converting with numpy tolist() 261727170 | |
1504098302 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7747#issuecomment-1504098302 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7747 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Zprf- | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-11T21:11:30Z | 2023-04-11T21:11:30Z | MEMBER | Welcome to Xarray! Next time you can just update the existing branch/PR . I'll close the other one |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Clarify vectorized indexing documentation 1663213844 | |
1504093110 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7724#issuecomment-1504093110 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7724 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZpqO2 | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-11T21:07:32Z | 2023-04-11T21:07:32Z | MEMBER | I think we can double check that the only failures are cftimeindex, restore the pin, then merge, and then remove the pin in #7731 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
`pandas=2.0` support 1655782486 | |
1503517162 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7461#issuecomment-1503517162 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7461 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Zndnq | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-11T14:50:11Z | 2023-04-11T14:50:11Z | MEMBER | Here is our support policy for versions: https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/getting-started-guide/installing.html#minimum-dependency-versions though I think we dropped py38 too early. For your current issue, I'm surprised this patch didn't fix it: https://github.com/conda-forge/conda-forge-repodata-patches-feedstock/pull/429 cc @hmaarrfk @ocefpaf |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
bump minimum versions, drop py38 1550109629 | |
1502378655 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7019#issuecomment-1502378655 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7019 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZjHqf | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-10T21:57:04Z | 2023-04-10T21:57:04Z | MEMBER |
Seems OK to me. The other option is to xfail the broken tests on old dask versions |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Generalize handling of chunked array types 1368740629 | |
1501903273 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7741#issuecomment-1501903273 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7741 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZhTmp | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-10T14:44:30Z | 2023-04-10T14:44:30Z | MEMBER | I forgot to say, this looks pretty great already. We just need tests. Thank you! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add lshift and rshift operators 1659654612 | |
1501902783 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7741#issuecomment-1501902783 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7741 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZhTe_ | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-10T14:44:02Z | 2023-04-10T14:44:02Z | MEMBER |
Grepping for |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add lshift and rshift operators 1659654612 | |
1499904939 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7719#issuecomment-1499904939 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7719 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZZrur | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-07T03:56:54Z | 2023-04-07T03:56:54Z | MEMBER | Thanks @kmuehlbauer |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement more Variable Coders 1654988876 | |
1499878014 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7730#issuecomment-1499878014 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7730 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZZlJ- | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-07T02:56:29Z | 2023-04-07T02:56:29Z | MEMBER | Also because your groups are sorted, ```python gb = da.groupby("time.year") using maxxr.set_options(use_flox=True) %timeit gb.max("time") %timeit gb.max("time", engine="flox") xr.set_options(use_flox=False) %timeit gb.max("time") ```
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
flox performance regression for cftime resampling 1657036222 | |
1499872700 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7730#issuecomment-1499872700 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7730 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZZj28 | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-07T02:45:24Z | 2023-04-07T02:49:41Z | MEMBER | The slowness is basically a bunch of copies happening in And then there's https://github.com/xarray-contrib/flox/issues/222 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
flox performance regression for cftime resampling 1657036222 | |
1499273560 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7733#issuecomment-1499273560 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7733 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZXRlY | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-06T15:44:48Z | 2023-04-06T15:44:48Z | MEMBER | Hi @alippai it is now possible to write "external" backends that register with xarray. See https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/internals/how-to-add-new-backend.html Feel free to ask questions here while you experiment with it. This tutorial may help too. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Blosc2 ndarray support 1657651596 | |
1498971031 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7730#issuecomment-1498971031 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7730 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZWHuX | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-06T12:18:50Z | 2023-04-06T12:18:50Z | MEMBER | Thanks can you add version info please |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
flox performance regression for cftime resampling 1657036222 | |
1498468954 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7723#issuecomment-1498468954 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7723 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZUNJa | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-06T04:15:06Z | 2023-04-06T04:15:06Z | MEMBER |
+1
Adding
Generally its worse if we obey some default fill values but not others, because it becomes quite confusing to a user. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
default fill_value not masked when read from file 1655569401 | |
1498447641 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7669#issuecomment-1498447641 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7669 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZUH8Z | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-06T03:40:24Z | 2023-04-06T03:40:24Z | MEMBER | The docs build failure is real, from some rst formatting error
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Docstrings examples for string methods 1639361476 | |
1498404409 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7722#issuecomment-1498404409 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7722 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZT9Y5 | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-06T02:26:41Z | 2023-04-06T02:26:41Z | MEMBER | how about not adding |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Conflicting _FillValue and missing_value on write 1655483374 | |
1498403174 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7723#issuecomment-1498403174 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7723 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZT9Fm | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-06T02:24:34Z | 2023-04-06T02:24:34Z | MEMBER | See https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5680#issuecomment-895508489
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
default fill_value not masked when read from file 1655569401 | |
1498386138 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7706#issuecomment-1498386138 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7706 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZT47a | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-06T01:56:08Z | 2023-04-06T01:56:08Z | MEMBER | Thanks @nishtha981 this is a great contribution! |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 1, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add: Adds a config.yml file for welcome-bot 1650309361 | |
1498375006 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7727#issuecomment-1498375006 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7727 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZT2Ne | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-06T01:37:06Z | 2023-04-06T01:37:06Z | MEMBER | I think we would gladly take a PR for this. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Implement lshift and rshift operators 1656363348 | |
1498186349 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7716#issuecomment-1498186349 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7716 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZTIJt | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-05T21:30:02Z | 2023-04-05T21:30:02Z | MEMBER |
Yes they are. We just haven't had the time to fix things. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
bad conda solve with pandas 2 1654022522 | |
1498119367 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6836#issuecomment-1498119367 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6836 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZS3zH | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-05T20:35:20Z | 2023-04-05T20:35:20Z | MEMBER | I think we could special-case extracting a multiindex level here: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/d4db16699f30ad1dc3e6861601247abf4ac96567/xarray/core/groupby.py#L469
@mschrimpf Can you try that and send in a PR? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
groupby(multi-index level) not working correctly on a multi-indexed DataArray or DataSet 1318992926 | |
1497690966 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7573#issuecomment-1497690966 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7573 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZRPNW | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-05T15:33:03Z | 2023-04-05T15:33:03Z | MEMBER | Does any one have any thoughts here? Shall we merge https://github.com/conda-forge/xarray-feedstock/pull/84/files and see if someone complains? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add optional min versions to conda-forge recipe (`run_constrained`) 1603957501 | |
1497686846 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7561#issuecomment-1497686846 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7561 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZROM- | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-05T15:30:16Z | 2023-04-05T15:30:16Z | MEMBER | Variables don't have coordinates so that won't work. mypy is correct here, it's a bug and we don't test for grouping by index variables. A commit reverting to the old It's not clear to me why we allow this actually. Seems like |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Introduce Grouper objects internally 1600382587 | |
1496083800 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7707#issuecomment-1496083800 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7707 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZLG1Y | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-04T14:34:27Z | 2023-04-04T14:34:27Z | MEMBER | Oh wow, we're down to mostly Zarr failures! cc @jhamman |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
⚠️ Nightly upstream-dev CI failed ⚠️ 1650481625 | |
1493220291 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7378#issuecomment-1493220291 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7378 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ZALvD | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-02T04:26:57Z | 2023-04-02T04:26:57Z | MEMBER |
Yes I think so.
Yes things like |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improve docstrings for better discoverability 1497131525 | |
1493004758 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6812#issuecomment-1493004758 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6812 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y_XHW | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-04-01T15:26:04Z | 2023-04-01T15:26:04Z | MEMBER | We should figure out how to express some of this understanding as tests (some xfailed). That way it's easy to check when something gets fixed, and prevent regressions. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improved CF decoding 1309966595 | |
1492098823 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7523#issuecomment-1492098823 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7523 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y758H | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-03-31T15:15:02Z | 2023-03-31T15:15:02Z | MEMBER | Thanks @headtr1ck great PR! |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
allow refreshing of backends 1581313830 | |
1490966436 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7689#issuecomment-1490966436 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7689 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y3lek | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-03-30T21:09:23Z | 2023-03-30T21:09:23Z | MEMBER | Sounds good to me! Thanks @jhamman |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add reset_encoding to dataset/dataarray/variable 1642922680 | |
1490885299 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7689#issuecomment-1490885299 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7689 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Y3Rqz | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-03-30T20:10:08Z | 2023-03-30T20:10:08Z | MEMBER |
I agree that it may not be necessary. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add reset_encoding to dataset/dataarray/variable 1642922680 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue >30