issue_comments
9 rows where issue = 292653302 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Add '_FillValue' to set of valid_encodings for netCDF4 backend · 9 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 365360917 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1869#issuecomment-365360917 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1869 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NTM2MDkxNw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-13T18:34:44Z | 2018-02-13T18:34:44Z | MEMBER | Yes, thanks @czr137 ! |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add '_FillValue' to set of valid_encodings for netCDF4 backend 292653302 | |
| 365352947 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1869#issuecomment-365352947 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1869 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NTM1Mjk0Nw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2018-02-13T18:07:44Z | 2018-02-13T18:07:44Z | MEMBER | @shoyer - this looks good to me. At some point, we should formalize how backends validate their encodings but I don't think that needs to happen here. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add '_FillValue' to set of valid_encodings for netCDF4 backend 292653302 | |
| 364993025 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1869#issuecomment-364993025 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1869 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NDk5MzAyNQ== | czr137 6153603 | 2018-02-12T17:12:23Z | 2018-02-12T17:12:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @shoyer, I think everything is in order to apply this bug fix. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add '_FillValue' to set of valid_encodings for netCDF4 backend 292653302 | |
| 362097521 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1869#issuecomment-362097521 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1869 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2MjA5NzUyMQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-01-31T22:49:00Z | 2018-01-31T22:49:00Z | MEMBER | We don't need any additional documentation, but we should note this bug fix in "What's new" |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add '_FillValue' to set of valid_encodings for netCDF4 backend 292653302 | |
| 362092065 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1869#issuecomment-362092065 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1869 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2MjA5MjA2NQ== | czr137 6153603 | 2018-01-31T22:26:29Z | 2018-01-31T22:26:29Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @shoyer, do you have an opinion on whether or not to include the scipy fix or leave it out of this PR? Also what is your opinion on the documentation? I feel nothing is needed as with this PR the code will operate as the documentation states. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add '_FillValue' to set of valid_encodings for netCDF4 backend 292653302 | |
| 361766665 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1869#issuecomment-361766665 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1869 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2MTc2NjY2NQ== | czr137 6153603 | 2018-01-30T23:11:57Z | 2018-01-30T23:48:44Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Now the tests pass (see comment beside the checkbox) Honestly, I'm not happy with where I put the fix in order to get the tests to pass when using the scipy backend by adding an additional test, but I didn't know where else to put the test. The test to see if the variable would be checked in prepare_variables came before the encoding could be managed in encode_cf_variable in conventions.py The alternative would be to remove the changes to scipy_.py and just have the test run only for the other engine backends and leave fixing the scipy backend for someone more familiar with it for another issue. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add '_FillValue' to set of valid_encodings for netCDF4 backend 292653302 | |
| 361736359 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1869#issuecomment-361736359 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1869 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2MTczNjM1OQ== | czr137 6153603 | 2018-01-30T21:14:52Z | 2018-01-30T21:14:52Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Wait to merge... I'm still getting failed tests using the scipy backend |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add '_FillValue' to set of valid_encodings for netCDF4 backend 292653302 | |
| 361734459 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1869#issuecomment-361734459 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1869 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2MTczNDQ1OQ== | czr137 6153603 | 2018-01-30T21:07:36Z | 2018-01-30T21:07:36Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Unit tests added in 9210dfa45428842c69b8d1835013159b1230c572. The first and the third added tests use the encoding kwarg and fail without b8fd86d5614d28254406d6f9b6d4e37383efc1be applied and pass with b8fd86d5614d28254406d6f9b6d4e37383efc1be applied, so they should catch a regression. The second added test passes both before and after b8fd86d5614d28254406d6f9b6d4e37383efc1be and was added for completeness as it pairs with the original test_explicitly_omit_fill_value, but for a coordinate. I still think nothing needs to change in the documentation as this now follows the intent of the design. I will leave it to you @shoyer or your delegate to address whether anything needs to be stated in the changelog / what's new. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add '_FillValue' to set of valid_encodings for netCDF4 backend 292653302 | |
| 361488957 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1869#issuecomment-361488957 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1869 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2MTQ4ODk1Nw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-01-30T06:20:08Z | 2018-01-30T06:20:08Z | MEMBER | Oops! Yes, this is was definitely a bug. Can you add a unit test for this, so we don't have a regression? Take a look at the test |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add '_FillValue' to set of valid_encodings for netCDF4 backend 292653302 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3