issue_comments

Table actions

4 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 427451138 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

issue 1

  • Various fixes for explicit Dataset.indexes · 4 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER · 4 ✖
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
480093002 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2858#issuecomment-480093002 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2858 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MDA5MzAwMg== spencerkclark 6628425 2019-04-04T22:59:48Z 2019-04-04T22:59:48Z MEMBER

Thanks @shoyer and @max-sixty 👍.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Various fixes for explicit Dataset.indexes 427451138
480071693 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2858#issuecomment-480071693 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2858 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MDA3MTY5Mw== shoyer 1217238 2019-04-04T21:32:27Z 2019-04-04T21:32:27Z MEMBER

I did look at the index invariant tests with more detail, and they look

Yes, this is the main part I was hoping for someone to take a look at. I would not trust my fixes if I did not believe the tests :).

The rest of it are various smaller changes, mostly correcting my previously mistaken (and untested) implementations.

 
{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Various fixes for explicit Dataset.indexes 427451138
479931557 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2858#issuecomment-479931557 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2858 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3OTkzMTU1Nw== max-sixty 5635139 2019-04-04T14:54:56Z 2019-04-04T14:54:56Z MEMBER

I had a look through the code. I'm struggling a bit to be a good reviewer given my current understanding of how the goals connect to to the implementation. With that disclaimer, the code looks good. So if anyone knows this better, maybe have a look. I did look at the index invariant tests with more detail, and they look 👍 

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Various fixes for explicit Dataset.indexes 427451138
479703772 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2858#issuecomment-479703772 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2858 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3OTcwMzc3Mg== shoyer 1217238 2019-04-04T00:20:26Z 2019-04-04T00:20:26Z MEMBER

@pydata/xarray it would be great if someone could review this. I'd like to submit this and then issue the 0.12.1 bug fix release.

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Various fixes for explicit Dataset.indexes 427451138

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);