issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 427451138 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Various fixes for explicit Dataset.indexes · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 480093002 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2858#issuecomment-480093002 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2858 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MDA5MzAwMg== | spencerkclark 6628425 | 2019-04-04T22:59:48Z | 2019-04-04T22:59:48Z | MEMBER | Thanks @shoyer and @max-sixty 👍. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Various fixes for explicit Dataset.indexes 427451138 | |
| 480071693 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2858#issuecomment-480071693 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2858 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MDA3MTY5Mw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-04-04T21:32:27Z | 2019-04-04T21:32:27Z | MEMBER |
Yes, this is the main part I was hoping for someone to take a look at. I would not trust my fixes if I did not believe the tests :). The rest of it are various smaller changes, mostly correcting my previously mistaken (and untested) implementations. |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Various fixes for explicit Dataset.indexes 427451138 | |
| 479931557 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2858#issuecomment-479931557 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2858 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3OTkzMTU1Nw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-04-04T14:54:56Z | 2019-04-04T14:54:56Z | MEMBER | I had a look through the code. I'm struggling a bit to be a good reviewer given my current understanding of how the goals connect to to the implementation. With that disclaimer, the code looks good. So if anyone knows this better, maybe have a look. I did look at the index invariant tests with more detail, and they look 👍 |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Various fixes for explicit Dataset.indexes 427451138 | |
| 479703772 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2858#issuecomment-479703772 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2858 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3OTcwMzc3Mg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-04-04T00:20:26Z | 2019-04-04T00:20:26Z | MEMBER | @pydata/xarray it would be great if someone could review this. I'd like to submit this and then issue the 0.12.1 bug fix release. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Various fixes for explicit Dataset.indexes 427451138 | |
| 478388568 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2858#issuecomment-478388568 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2858 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3ODM4ODU2OA== | pep8speaks 24736507 | 2019-03-31T21:48:54Z | 2019-04-03T16:22:01Z | NONE | Hello @shoyer! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found: There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! :beers: Comment last updated at 2019-04-03 16:22:01 UTC |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Various fixes for explicit Dataset.indexes 427451138 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4