issue_comments
51 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and user = 868027 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- DocOtak · 51 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1472454634 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7608#issuecomment-1472454634 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7608 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Xw9_q | DocOtak 868027 | 2023-03-16T17:57:28Z | 2023-03-16T17:57:28Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I think 1d arrays of other data types are allowed... it's just that the 1d dim value is hidden from you in attributes. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dataset attrs list of strings to_netcdf() error 1619835929 | |
1472379128 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7608#issuecomment-1472379128 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7608 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Xwrj4 | DocOtak 868027 | 2023-03-16T17:12:43Z | 2023-03-16T17:12:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @dcherian would the following be a good place to put this check/raise? https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/b36819b1ed4f74ba8e254f2baa790303ef350e4a/xarray/backends/netcdf3.py#L75-L84 scipy has a short list of allowed attr dtypes, would we want our check to be in the form of an allow list? I guess does scipy implement all that is allowed in netcdf3? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dataset attrs list of strings to_netcdf() error 1619835929 | |
1464795339 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7608#issuecomment-1464795339 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7608 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85XTwDL | DocOtak 868027 | 2023-03-11T02:19:32Z | 2023-03-11T02:19:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Are you able to install the netcdf4 package in your environment? If my memory serves, the scipy netCDF implementation only supports netCDF3 and array of strings in attributes are a netcdf4 feature. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dataset attrs list of strings to_netcdf() error 1619835929 | |
1367488859 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7404#issuecomment-1367488859 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7404 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Rgjlb | DocOtak 868027 | 2022-12-29T17:45:33Z | 2022-12-29T17:45:33Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I've personally seen a lot of what looks like memory reuse in numpy and related libraries. I don't think any of this happens explicitly but have never investigated. I would have some expectation that if memory was not being released as expected, that opening and closing the dataset in a loop would increase memory usage, it didn't on the recent library versions I have. ```python Start: 89.71875 MiB Before opening file: 90.203125 MiB After opening file: 96.6875 MiB Filename: test.py Line # Mem usage Increment Occurrences Line Contents
End: 96.6875 MiB ``` Show Versions``` INSTALLED VERSIONS ------------------ commit: None python: 3.8.13 (default, Jul 23 2022, 17:00:57) [Clang 13.1.6 (clang-1316.0.21.2.5)] python-bits: 64 OS: Darwin OS-release: 22.1.0 machine: arm64 processor: arm byteorder: little LC_ALL: None LANG: en_US.UTF-8 LOCALE: ('en_US', 'UTF-8') libhdf5: 1.12.2 libnetcdf: 4.9.0 xarray: 2022.11.0 pandas: 1.4.3 numpy: 1.23.5 scipy: None netCDF4: 1.6.0 pydap: None h5netcdf: None h5py: None Nio: None zarr: None cftime: 1.6.1 nc_time_axis: None PseudoNetCDF: None rasterio: None cfgrib: None iris: None bottleneck: None dask: None distributed: None matplotlib: 3.5.3 cartopy: None seaborn: None numbagg: None fsspec: None cupy: None pint: None sparse: None flox: None numpy_groupies: None setuptools: 56.0.0 pip: 22.0.4 conda: None pytest: 6.2.5 IPython: 8.4.0 sphinx: 5.1.1 ``` |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Memory leak - xr.open_dataset() not releasing memory. 1512460818 | |
1262828844 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7098#issuecomment-1262828844 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7098 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LRT0s | DocOtak 868027 | 2022-09-29T21:22:32Z | 2022-09-29T21:22:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @TomNicholas Something different will need to happen with that cast eventually. See #6191 for something that is failing on some systems that users have but is currently unable to be captured in the tests. Numpy has already added runtime warnings about doing this, and is "thinking about" making nan to int casts raise https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/14412. Xarray's own @shoyer has hit issues like this before as well https://github.com/numpy/numpy/issues/6109. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Don't cast NaN to integer 1389176083 | |
1246041612 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7032#issuecomment-1246041612 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7032 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KRRYM | DocOtak 868027 | 2022-09-13T23:13:21Z | 2022-09-13T23:13:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Pickle requires that the internal details of xarray's data structures be the same between versions. The documentation about xarray's pickle support says pickle is not guaranteed to work between versions of xarray. Why didn't netcdf work for your use case? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
DataArray saved from v0.19.0 is faulty when reading with v0.21.0+ 1372053736 | |
1209664972 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6191#issuecomment-1209664972 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6191 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85IGgXM | DocOtak 868027 | 2022-08-09T17:30:07Z | 2022-08-09T17:30:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Some additional info for when how to figure out the best way to address this. For the decode using pandas approach, two things I tried worked: using a pandas.array with a nullable integer data type, or simulating what happens on x86_64 systems by checking for nans in the incoming array and setting those positions to the pandas nullable integer array: ```python
``` The pandas solution is explicitly experimental in their docs, and the emulate version just feels "hacky" to me. These don't break any existing tests on my local machine. cftime itself has no support for nan type missing values and will fail: (on x86_64) ```python
cftime is happy with masked arrays: ```python
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
[Bug]: reading NaT/NaN on M1 ARM chip 1114351614 | |
1209567966 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6191#issuecomment-1209567966 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6191 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85IGIre | DocOtak 868027 | 2022-08-09T15:52:31Z | 2022-08-09T15:52:31Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I got caught by this one yesterday on an M1 machine. I did some digging and found what I think to be the underlying issue. The short explanation is that the time conversion functions do an I knew from my own data files that it wasn't the first element of the array being substituted but whatever was in the units as the epoch. I started to poke at the xarray internals (and the CFtime internals) to try to get a minimal example working, eventually found the following: On an M1: ```python
On an x86_64: ```python
This issue is not Apple/M1/clang specific, I tested on an aws graviton (arm) instance and got the same results with ubuntu/gcc: ```python Python 3.10.4 (main, Jun 29 2022, 12:14:53) [GCC 11.2.0] on linux Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
Here is where the cast is happening on the internal xarray implementation, CFtime has similar casts in its implementation. https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/8417f495e6b81a60833f86a978e5a8080a619aa0/xarray/coding/times.py#L237-L239 |
{ "total_count": 4, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 2, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
[Bug]: reading NaT/NaN on M1 ARM chip 1114351614 | |
921889702 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5794#issuecomment-921889702 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5794 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8428uum | DocOtak 868027 | 2021-09-17T15:32:04Z | 2021-09-17T15:32:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Python's import machinery has a lot of caching going on. In most cases, additional imports of a module that has been imported previously is about as expensive as a dict lookup. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Single matplotlib import 996352280 | |
772729659 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4835#issuecomment-772729659 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4835 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3MjcyOTY1OQ== | DocOtak 868027 | 2021-02-03T18:38:34Z | 2021-02-03T18:38:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Also, the build step also has a |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
📚 New theme & rearrangement of the docs 790677360 | |
736768644 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4634#issuecomment-736768644 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4634 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNjc2ODY0NA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2020-12-01T19:29:36Z | 2020-12-01T19:29:36Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @dcherian Often I find it a little easier to understand the Conformance Document, bullet point two says:
This shouldn't prevent xarray from doing something useful with non conforming files if it can. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Read of netCDF file fails with units attribute that is not of type string 754413100 | |
736609280 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4634#issuecomment-736609280 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4634 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDczNjYwOTI4MA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2020-12-01T15:02:22Z | 2020-12-01T15:02:22Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Keep in mind that the NetCDF user guide "strongly recommends" that units be a character string. The CF Conventions requires the units to be a character string. I think in xarray you can set |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Read of netCDF file fails with units attribute that is not of type string 754413100 | |
670991386 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2844#issuecomment-670991386 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2844 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MDk5MTM4Ng== | DocOtak 868027 | 2020-08-09T01:11:09Z | 2020-08-09T01:11:09Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Yes, my view is that things in What would be really awesome is some sort of variable proxy I could replace the string names with actual references/pointers to the correct DataArray in the Dataset. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Read grid mapping and bounds as coords 424265093 | |
670808763 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2844#issuecomment-670808763 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2844 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY3MDgwODc2Mw== | DocOtak 868027 | 2020-08-08T02:12:08Z | 2020-08-08T02:12:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I decided to try out this PR on some of the data files we are working with at my data office. In our datasets we have per variable quality flag information per variable uncertainty information. The CF way of tying all these together is via the ancillary_variables attribute. This PR pulls all these out into the Dataset coordinates. Since in the xarray data model (right now) the coordinates apply to an entire dataset, this feels inappropriate and maybe even breaking. The ancillary_variables attribute is not used in CF grid mapping or bounds as far as I can tell. Here is an example using this PR (note that all the varN type names will be replaced with better variable names before we publish these): ```python In [1]: import xarray as xr In [2]: ds = xr.open_dataset("examples/converted/06AQ19840719.nc") In [3]: ds Out[3]: <xarray.Dataset> Dimensions: (N_LEVELS: 24, N_PROF: 38) Coordinates: var1_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var4_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var5_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var6_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var7_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var8_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var9_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var10_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var11_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var12_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var13_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var14_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var15_qc (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... pressure (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float64 ... latitude (N_PROF) float64 ... longitude (N_PROF) float64 ... time (N_PROF) datetime64[ns] ... expocode (N_PROF) object ... station (N_PROF) object ... cast (N_PROF) int8 ... sample (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) object ... Dimensions without coordinates: N_LEVELS, N_PROF Data variables: var0 (N_PROF) object ... var1 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) object ... var2 (N_PROF) float32 ... var3 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var4 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var5 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var6 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var7 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var8 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var9 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var10 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var11 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var12 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var13 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var14 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... var15 (N_PROF, N_LEVELS) float32 ... Attributes: Conventions: CF-1.8 CCHDO-0.1.dev157+g52933e0.d20200707 ``` This looks especially confusing when you ask for one specific variable:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Read grid mapping and bounds as coords 424265093 | |
625481974 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4045#issuecomment-625481974 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4045 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyNTQ4MTk3NA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2020-05-07T20:32:22Z | 2020-05-07T20:32:22Z | CONTRIBUTOR | This has something to do with the time values at some point being a float: ```python
It looks like this is happening somewhere in the cftime library. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Millisecond precision is lost on datetime64 during IO roundtrip 614275938 | |
624408302 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4024#issuecomment-624408302 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4024 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyNDQwODMwMg== | DocOtak 868027 | 2020-05-06T02:19:09Z | 2020-05-06T02:19:09Z | CONTRIBUTOR | VS Code will tell you if it is in "dark" "light" or "high contrast" modes https://code.visualstudio.com/api/extension-guides/webview#theming-webview-content Looks like there is an upstream issue which might prevent getting the actual theme colors in some situations: https://github.com/microsoft/vscode-python/issues/9597 For my own stuff in VS Code, I usually disable the HTML repr in those notebooks. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
small contrast of html view in VScode darkmode 611643130 | |
620746876 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4012#issuecomment-620746876 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4012 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyMDc0Njg3Ng== | DocOtak 868027 | 2020-04-28T17:26:56Z | 2020-04-28T17:26:56Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I really like what it did to some of the long |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Apply blackdoc to the documentation 607814501 | |
619320263 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4002#issuecomment-619320263 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4002 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxOTMyMDI2Mw== | DocOtak 868027 | 2020-04-25T04:48:12Z | 2020-04-25T04:48:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | My concern was due to python not evaluating |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove dangerous default argument 606549469 | |
619281828 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4002#issuecomment-619281828 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4002 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxOTI4MTgyOA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2020-04-24T23:40:54Z | 2020-04-24T23:40:54Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Slightly related, I've noticed a bunch of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove dangerous default argument 606549469 | |
594783943 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3370#issuecomment-594783943 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3370 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5NDc4Mzk0Mw== | DocOtak 868027 | 2020-03-04T19:38:01Z | 2020-03-04T19:38:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Every time I see activity on this... I feel like it's all my fault. Feel free to undo whatever is needed. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 1, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hundreds of Sphinx errors 502130982 | |
590920738 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3796#issuecomment-590920738 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3796 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5MDkyMDczOA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2020-02-25T15:22:29Z | 2020-02-25T15:22:29Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The docs seem to build ok on Azure piplines, is it possible to get the built docs from that and publish somewhere? I do know this is possible with Travis, but haven't actually done it myself since my docs don't (yet?) have a memory problem. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
RTD failing yet again 570190199 | |
555715128 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3178#issuecomment-555715128 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3178 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NTcxNTEyOA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-11-19T21:07:50Z | 2019-11-19T21:07:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Any recollection as to if these ever worked as expected? Looks like between landing this change and doing the 0.14 release, the sphinx version bumped from 2.1.2 to 2.2.0 which included some changes to autodoc... This PR might be of interest https://github.com/sphinx-doc/sphinx/pull/6592 but it is not immediately obvious to me how/if this could have broken things. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
type annotations make docs confusing 476222321 | |
542594876 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3407#issuecomment-542594876 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3407 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MjU5NDg3Ng== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-10-16T08:44:50Z | 2019-10-16T08:44:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi @zxdawn Does this modified version of your code do what you want?:
Times = "2019-07-25_00:00:00" ; } ``` Some explanation of what is going on:
Strings in numpy aren't the most friendly thing to work with, and the data types can be a little confusing. In your code, the Since you know that your string length is going to be 19, you should tell numpy about this instead of xarray by either specifying the data type as |
{ "total_count": 3, "+1": 3, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Save 'S1' array without the char_dim_name dimension 507658070 | |
525332330 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3246#issuecomment-525332330 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3246 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNTMzMjMzMA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-27T14:39:53Z | 2019-08-27T14:39:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi @gr4fitt3 Do you know if the data are already gridded somehow? if yes, some simple reshaping might be all you need. However, I suspect they are actually swaths traced out by the satellite, in which case perhaps the pyresample library might help? I've never used it myself. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Transform variables into coordinates and associate them with another variable 484243348 | |
525325332 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3227#issuecomment-525325332 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3227 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNTMyNTMzMg== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-27T14:24:35Z | 2019-08-27T14:24:35Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi @gwgundersen some clarification on those "extra snippets", github is not aware of the ipython directive so it prints those out like code snippets. In the actual built docs, these don't appear (the I personally feel that the code that makes these temporary files should be responsible for cleaning it up, especially since it already tries, and they aren't build artifacts needed in other steps. I'd probably reach for the tempfile.TemporaryDirectory in the standard library and bracket the dask docs in a create, cd in, cd out, cleanup type flow. There is already a suppressed setup ipython block at the top of the dask docs too. @max-sixty Any opinions on which option we should go for? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Building the docs creates temporary files 482023929 | |
522589729 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3227#issuecomment-522589729 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3227 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMjU4OTcyOQ== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-19T14:03:24Z | 2019-08-19T14:03:24Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The files and directories that were not cleaned up by the At leas one of these files is cleaned up at the end, see the ipython block. I'd probably look into something like a temporary directory rather than trying to track down all the "example artifacts" created during a run. I'm not sure what sort of configuration the IPython blocks have, but there are also some tempdir utilities in IPython. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Building the docs creates temporary files 482023929 | |
521349841 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3215#issuecomment-521349841 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3215 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMTM0OTg0MQ== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-14T17:51:06Z | 2019-08-14T17:51:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I think this is being thrown by dask, here is an even more minimal example: ```python
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
decode_cf called on mfdataset throws error: 'Array' object has no attribute 'tolist' 480512400 | |
518716822 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3187#issuecomment-518716822 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3187 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODcxNjgyMg== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-06T15:20:06Z | 2019-08-06T15:20:06Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Sure, that seems to work as well, want a second PR or just update this one (with some forcing)? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
reduce the size of example dataset in dask docs 477427854 | |
518677703 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3182#issuecomment-518677703 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3182 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODY3NzcwMw== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-06T13:49:47Z | 2019-08-06T13:49:47Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Seems the docs are still failing to build, except this time it is being killed due to too much resource consumption. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
RTD build failing 476494705 | |
518427365 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3186#issuecomment-518427365 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3186 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODQyNzM2NQ== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-05T22:37:32Z | 2019-08-05T22:37:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Examining the output of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
bump rasterio to 1.0.24 in doc building environment 477084478 | |
518426134 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3182#issuecomment-518426134 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3182 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODQyNjEzNA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-05T22:32:12Z | 2019-08-05T22:32:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @max-sixty I made a PR which bumps rasterio. Something else to consider is enabling channel_priority strict in the conda environment. When I had enabled that in local testing, the conda solver was unable to create the requested environment. It seemed the requested rasterio version was no longer on conda-forge (though maybe under the cf201901 label?). Though if I recall, there was also a mismatch between the requested pandas and python versions when strict was enabled. It seems the trade off is where you want the failure to occur, either in making the environment in conda, or when some package stops working. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
RTD build failing 476494705 | |
518381266 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3182#issuecomment-518381266 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3182 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODM4MTI2Ng== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-05T20:12:37Z | 2019-08-05T20:12:37Z | CONTRIBUTOR | So it looks more like a conda channel mixing problem to me now. Perhaps just bumping rasterio to 1.0.24? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
RTD build failing 476494705 | |
518368420 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3182#issuecomment-518368420 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3182 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODM2ODQyMA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-05T19:32:10Z | 2019-08-05T19:32:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Has anyone with access tried just wiping the env? https://docs.readthedocs.io/en/stable/guides/wipe-environment.html Specifically, when I was testing locally my rasterio was not importing, but at some point in the past, had run successfully. I was able to fix by removing the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
RTD build failing 476494705 | |
518062884 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3182#issuecomment-518062884 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3182 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxODA2Mjg4NA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-05T02:25:02Z | 2019-08-05T02:25:02Z | CONTRIBUTOR | More information here: https://sphinx-gallery.github.io/configuration.html#don-t-fail-the-build-on-exit |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
RTD build failing 476494705 | |
517840342 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3180#issuecomment-517840342 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3180 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNzg0MDM0Mg== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-02T20:50:49Z | 2019-08-02T20:50:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I was diffing the directory outputs when testing locally and nothing really breaking stood out to me... I think this is safe enough that it should be able to merge and asses the results. IMO the results were quite pretty and definitely addressed #3056 in most places. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
enable sphinx.ext.napoleon 476323960 | |
517817952 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3178#issuecomment-517817952 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3178 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNzgxNzk1Mg== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-02T19:27:45Z | 2019-08-02T19:27:45Z | CONTRIBUTOR | See #3180 for the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
type annotations make docs confusing 476222321 | |
517815307 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3178#issuecomment-517815307 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3178 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNzgxNTMwNw== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-02T19:17:59Z | 2019-08-02T19:17:59Z | CONTRIBUTOR | So I made a PR for just removing the type annotations, turns out it is built in to autodoc. Enabling napoleon seems to be less "clean". While it doesn't actually conflict with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
type annotations make docs confusing 476222321 | |
517786566 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3178#issuecomment-517786566 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3178 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNzc4NjU2Ng== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-02T17:38:49Z | 2019-08-02T17:38:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Suspicions confirmed. I removed the type parts in the docstrings. The attached is the result which I think is way less readable:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
type annotations make docs confusing 476222321 | |
517781349 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3178#issuecomment-517781349 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3178 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNzc4MTM0OQ== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-02T17:22:10Z | 2019-08-02T17:22:10Z | CONTRIBUTOR | So I think why it isn't putting the types anywhere in the docs is because they already exist (at least for this Dataset The relevant part of the code in the extension appears to be this https://github.com/agronholm/sphinx-autodoc-typehints/blob/master/sphinx_autodoc_typehints.py#L333:L338 It's looking for |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
type annotations make docs confusing 476222321 | |
517772870 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3178#issuecomment-517772870 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3178 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNzc3Mjg3MA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-02T16:55:22Z | 2019-08-02T16:55:22Z | CONTRIBUTOR | So the plugin seems to "just works" in that it remove these data type annotation, it doesn't seem to put them anywhere. I can probably put the docs I built somewhere if you all want to look at them. Here is a screen shot of the "Dataset" class, first one is just the extension, second screenshot also has the napoleon extension enabled. Main difference is how the "parameters" appear.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
type annotations make docs confusing 476222321 | |
517742116 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3178#issuecomment-517742116 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3178 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNzc0MjExNg== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-02T15:23:46Z | 2019-08-02T15:23:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @dcherian sure, I'll try it right now with the xarray docs |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
type annotations make docs confusing 476222321 | |
517734518 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3178#issuecomment-517734518 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3178 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNzczNDUxOA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-08-02T15:03:07Z | 2019-08-02T15:03:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Perhaps the sphinx-autodoc-typehints extension? The docs suggest it will remove the types from the method signatures and put them in the in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
type annotations make docs confusing 476222321 | |
497066189 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2995#issuecomment-497066189 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2995 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NzA2NjE4OQ== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-05-29T18:56:17Z | 2019-05-29T18:56:17Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks @rabernat I had forgotten about the other netcdf storage engines... do you know if h5netcdf stable enough that I should use in "production" outside of xarray for my netcdf4 reading/writing needs? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remote writing NETCDF4 files to Amazon S3 449706080 | |
497026828 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2995#issuecomment-497026828 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2995 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NzAyNjgyOA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-05-29T17:11:10Z | 2019-05-29T17:12:51Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi @Non-Descript-Individual I've found that the netcdf4-python library really wants to have direct access to a disk/filesystem to work, it also really wants to do its own file access management. I've always attributed this to the python library being a wrapper for the netcdf C library. My guess would be that the easiest way to do what you want is to separate the writing of the netcdf file step in xarray from the putting the file into S3. Something like this:
The netcdf4-python library does seem to provide an interface for the "diskless" flags. In this case, from the examples it looks to give you a bunch of bytes in a Alternatively, @rabernat is an advocate of using zarr when putting netcdf compatible data into cloud storage, the zarr docs provide an example using s3fs Quick edit: Here is the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remote writing NETCDF4 files to Amazon S3 449706080 | |
486024154 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2888#issuecomment-486024154 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2888 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4NjAyNDE1NA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-04-24T00:41:49Z | 2019-04-24T00:41:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Some of my workflows involve the manual creation and destruction of virtualenvs. On occasion, I've found myself wanting a Alternatively, it might be nice to be able to query xarray for what its current serialization capabilities are. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Optional extras to manage dependencies 432058005 | |
475914120 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2848#issuecomment-475914120 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2848 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ3NTkxNDEyMA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2019-03-23T23:37:41Z | 2019-03-23T23:37:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | When I was looking into this real quick after it was posted to the xarray mailing list, one of the things I attempted to do was use |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
When decode_times fails, warn rather than failing 424545013 | |
416423848 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2322#issuecomment-416423848 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2322 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxNjQyMzg0OA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2018-08-28T01:48:00Z | 2018-08-28T01:48:00Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hey @shoyer no worries, we all get busy with other things. Seems I messed up the docs slightly, a fix is in #2386 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
BUG: modify behavior of Dataset.filter_by_attrs to match netCDF4.Data… 345322908 | |
410381054 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2322#issuecomment-410381054 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2322 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQxMDM4MTA1NA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2018-08-03T21:28:14Z | 2018-08-03T21:28:14Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @shoyer Hopefully I've done this all correctly, please have a look once all the tests pass. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
BUG: modify behavior of Dataset.filter_by_attrs to match netCDF4.Data… 345322908 | |
408580878 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2322#issuecomment-408580878 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2322 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwODU4MDg3OA== | DocOtak 868027 | 2018-07-28T04:06:03Z | 2018-07-28T04:06:03Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Wow this is sloppy.... I’ll get the test added and the code cleaned up. Any thoughts on the modified doc string? Should I add this change as “breaking” or “bug fix” in the what’s new doc? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
BUG: modify behavior of Dataset.filter_by_attrs to match netCDF4.Data… 345322908 | |
408263759 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2315#issuecomment-408263759 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2315 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwODI2Mzc1OQ== | DocOtak 868027 | 2018-07-26T23:17:26Z | 2018-07-26T23:17:26Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I can work on a PR tomorrow. Does the benefit of having the same behavior as the netCDF4 library warrant a potentially breaking change for existing code which relies on the current behavior of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Behavior of filter_by_attrs() does not match netCDF4.Dataset.get_variables_by_attributes 344631360 | |
408260961 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2315#issuecomment-408260961 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2315 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwODI2MDk2MQ== | DocOtak 868027 | 2018-07-26T23:01:44Z | 2018-07-26T23:01:44Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm fairly certain that the Here is the currently implementation body from https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/blob/master/netCDF4/_netCDF4.pyx#L2868 ```python vs = [] has_value_flag = False this is a hack to make inheritance work in MFDataset(which stores variables in _vars)_vars = self.variables if _vars is None: _vars = self._vars for vname in _vars: var = _vars[vname] for k, v in kwargs.items(): if callable(v): has_value_flag = v(getattr(var, k, None)) if has_value_flag is False: break elif hasattr(var, k) and getattr(var, k) == v: has_value_flag = True else: has_value_flag = False break if has_value_flag is True: vs.append(_vars[vname]) return vs ``` The difference appears to be in the presence of that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Behavior of filter_by_attrs() does not match netCDF4.Dataset.get_variables_by_attributes 344631360 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 29