issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 963239311 and user = 13205162 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
899947392 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-899947392 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841pBuA | tomchor 13205162 | 2021-08-17T02:33:45Z | 2021-08-17T02:33:45Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Ah, I see. Thanks for merging! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
899943472 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-899943472 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841pAww | tomchor 13205162 | 2021-08-17T02:22:01Z | 2021-08-17T02:22:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Thanks! I think you spoke too soon though haha. One of the tests is failing and I don't really know why! I never touched the
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
899085600 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-899085600 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841lvUg | tomchor 13205162 | 2021-08-15T17:32:23Z | 2021-08-15T17:32:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Thanks! This makes it much easier to test everything locally. I test the new test locally and it should pass now.
I also saw that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
897160926 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-897160926 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841eZbe | tomchor 13205162 | 2021-08-11T21:17:26Z | 2021-08-11T21:17:26Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I defined a function that tests that a long latex sequence stays intact after going through @dcherian could you please confirm? Also the tests weren't passing before I added this last commit, and I have no idea why. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
894882015 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-894882015 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841VtDf | tomchor 13205162 | 2021-08-09T00:27:12Z | 2021-08-09T00:27:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I couldn't figure out any way to avoid splitting LaTeX code. I suspect that the way to do it might be kind of complex (but I'm happy if someone can prove me wrong). We can also increase the number of columns for the latex option even more to maintain simplicity... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1