issue_comments
11 rows where issue = 963239311 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting · 11 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
896220721 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-896220721 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841az4x | github-actions[bot] 41898282 | 2021-08-10T18:32:46Z | 2021-08-17T02:59:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Unit Test Results6 files ±0 6 suites ±0 59m 58s :stopwatch: ±0s 16 218 tests ±0 14 482 :heavy_check_mark: ±0 1 735 :zzz: ±0 1 :x: ±0 90 504 runs ±0 82 323 :heavy_check_mark: ±0 8 175 :zzz: ±0 6 :x: ±0 For more details on these failures, see this check. Results for commit 41099669. ± Comparison against base commit 41099669. :recycle: This comment has been updated with latest results. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
899947392 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-899947392 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841pBuA | tomchor 13205162 | 2021-08-17T02:33:45Z | 2021-08-17T02:33:45Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Ah, I see. Thanks for merging! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
899945997 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-899945997 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841pBYN | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-08-17T02:29:33Z | 2021-08-17T02:29:33Z | MEMBER | That's unrelated, see #5654 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
899943472 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-899943472 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841pAww | tomchor 13205162 | 2021-08-17T02:22:01Z | 2021-08-17T02:22:01Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Thanks! I think you spoke too soon though haha. One of the tests is failing and I don't really know why! I never touched the
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
899929020 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-899929020 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841o9O8 | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-08-17T01:41:51Z | 2021-08-17T01:42:08Z | MEMBER | Looks great. I'll merge when tests pass. Thanks @tomchor. I see this is your first PR here. Welcome to xarray! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
894660777 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-894660777 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841U3Cp | pep8speaks 24736507 | 2021-08-07T14:18:19Z | 2021-08-17T01:41:00Z | NONE | Hello @tomchor! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found: There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! :beers: Comment last updated at 2021-08-17 01:40:59 UTC |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
899085600 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-899085600 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841lvUg | tomchor 13205162 | 2021-08-15T17:32:23Z | 2021-08-15T17:32:23Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Thanks! This makes it much easier to test everything locally. I test the new test locally and it should pass now.
I also saw that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
897696009 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-897696009 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841gcEJ | dcherian 2448579 | 2021-08-12T14:39:05Z | 2021-08-12T14:39:05Z | MEMBER | @tomchor thanks. Yes all you need to do is define a test function that checks something and pytest will run it. you can run it following the instructions here: https://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/contributing.html#running-the-test-suite (something like this)
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
897160926 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-897160926 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841eZbe | tomchor 13205162 | 2021-08-11T21:17:26Z | 2021-08-11T21:17:26Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I defined a function that tests that a long latex sequence stays intact after going through @dcherian could you please confirm? Also the tests weren't passing before I added this last commit, and I have no idea why. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
894882015 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-894882015 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841VtDf | tomchor 13205162 | 2021-08-09T00:27:12Z | 2021-08-09T00:27:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
I couldn't figure out any way to avoid splitting LaTeX code. I suspect that the way to do it might be kind of complex (but I'm happy if someone can prove me wrong). We can also increase the number of columns for the latex option even more to maintain simplicity... |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 | |
894867998 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5682#issuecomment-894867998 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5682 | IC_kwDOAMm_X841Vpoe | Illviljan 14371165 | 2021-08-08T22:58:21Z | 2021-08-08T22:58:21Z | MEMBER | I wonder if it will look best if we avoid splitting inside the latex code?
I was playing around a little with regex but I didn't get that far: ```python import textwrap import re name = r"$Ra_s = \mathrm{mean}(\epsilon_k) / \mu M^2_\infty$"
extra = "Longwinded comments about something confusing. "
units = r"$[N / m]$"
label_raw = name + extra + units
label_notex = re.sub("\$(.+?)\$", "X ", label_raw, flags=re.DOTALL)
label_notex_wrap = textwrap.wrap(label_notex, 30)
label_tex_wrap = ... # regex to add back the latex strings. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Improves rendering of complex LaTeX expressions as `long_name`s when plotting 963239311 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 5