issue_comments
12 rows where issue = 686495257 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays · 12 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 682038763 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-682038763 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MjAzODc2Mw== | darikg 6875882 | 2020-08-27T15:58:49Z | 2020-08-27T15:58:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks for everybody's help! Also just wanted to say, you guys have an incredible test suite. |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 1,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 | |
| 682003349 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-682003349 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MjAwMzM0OQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-08-27T14:58:21Z | 2020-08-27T14:58:21Z | MEMBER | @darikg Thank you for the contribution! If you want to put a whatsnew, feel free to — either as a new PR or if you're planning any more contributions atm, then as part of that. Not obligatory though |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 | |
| 682002273 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-682002273 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MjAwMjI3Mw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-08-27T14:56:33Z | 2020-08-27T14:56:33Z | MEMBER | Great, let's merge both? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 | |
| 681999585 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-681999585 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MTk5OTU4NQ== | darikg 6875882 | 2020-08-27T14:52:27Z | 2020-08-27T14:52:27Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I went with @keewis's last suggestion because I think it makes the most sense for deepcopy to behave as expected even with older versions of numpy |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 | |
| 681987321 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-681987321 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MTk4NzMyMQ== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-08-27T14:32:46Z | 2020-08-27T14:32:46Z | MEMBER | actually, we should probably merge #4381 to fix the formatting. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 | |
| 681985792 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-681985792 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MTk4NTc5Mg== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-08-27T14:30:17Z | 2020-08-27T14:30:17Z | MEMBER | This looks good to go! There's one small formatting fix, and then we can merge. Cheers @darikg |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 | |
| 681041062 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-681041062 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MTA0MTA2Mg== | pep8speaks 24736507 | 2020-08-26T18:12:36Z | 2020-08-27T13:55:19Z | NONE | Hello @darikg! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found: There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! :beers: Comment last updated at 2020-08-27 13:55:19 UTC |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 | |
| 681103837 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-681103837 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MTEwMzgzNw== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-08-26T20:22:55Z | 2020-08-26T20:22:55Z | MEMBER | thanks for tracking this down. The easiest way to fix the test would be to decorate it with
We might also try to rewrite the condition to:
Thoughts, @pydata/xarray? |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 | |
| 681097210 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-681097210 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MTA5NzIxMA== | darikg 6875882 | 2020-08-26T20:08:43Z | 2020-08-26T20:08:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Oh, sorry, I actually can reproduce it locally. Turns out arrays in numpy 1.15 don't have
could just be
But I'm not familiar with |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 | |
| 681041552 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-681041552 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MTA0MTU1Mg== | darikg 6875882 | 2020-08-26T18:13:32Z | 2020-08-26T18:13:32Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Weird, I can't reproduce that locally, even after reverting to numpy 1.15. Trying with a non-object class |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 | |
| 681038709 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-681038709 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MTAzODcwOQ== | keewis 14808389 | 2020-08-26T18:07:53Z | 2020-08-26T18:07:53Z | MEMBER | it seems that's a backwards compatibility issue with |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 | |
| 681031704 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4379#issuecomment-681031704 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4379 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY4MTAzMTcwNA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-08-26T17:54:07Z | 2020-08-26T17:54:07Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the PR @darikg ! Re tests failing — is there a chance python interns the |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Use deepcopy recursively on numpy arrays 686495257 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4