issue_comments
8 rows where issue = 494906646 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- xr.combine_nested() fails when passed nested DataSets · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
584975960 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3315#issuecomment-584975960 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3315 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU4NDk3NTk2MA== | friedrichknuth 10554254 | 2020-02-12T01:46:00Z | 2020-02-12T01:46:00Z | NONE | Few observations after looking at the default flags for
The description of Another option is ```python objs = [xr.DataArray([0], dims='x', name='a'), xr.DataArray([1], dims='x', name='b')] xr.concat(objs, dim='x', compat='identical') ```
... and is the case for ``` objs = [xr.Dataset({'a': ('x', [0])}), xr.Dataset({'b': ('x', [0])})] xr.concat(objs, dim='x') ```
However, ```python objs = [xr.DataArray([0], dims='x', name='a', attrs={'foo':1}), xr.DataArray([1], dims='x', name='a', attrs={'bar':2})] xr.concat(objs, dim='x', compat='identical') ``` succeeds with
but again fails on Datasets, as one would expect from the description. ```python ds1 = xr.Dataset({'a': ('x', [0])}) ds1.attrs['foo'] = 'example attribute' ds2 = xr.Dataset({'a': ('x', [1])}) ds2.attrs['bar'] = 'example attribute' objs = [ds1,ds2] xr.concat(objs, dim='x',compat='identical') ```
Also had a look at Potential resolutions:
Final thought: perhaps promoting to Dataset when all requirements are met for a DataArray to be considered as such, might simplify keeping operations and checks consistent? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.combine_nested() fails when passed nested DataSets 494906646 | |
535061773 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3315#issuecomment-535061773 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3315 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzNTA2MTc3Mw== | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2019-09-25T14:53:34Z | 2019-09-25T15:00:27Z | MEMBER | Really? Okay, so that means that currently we don't treat a named DataArray and a single-variable Dataset as if they are the same. For example I would have expected these two operations to give the same result:
xarray/core/utils.py:385: KeyError ``` Is this what we want to do? Surely the first one should also fail, else this is counter-intuitive. I think of a named DataArray and a single-variable Dataset as being the same thing, just a single physical variable? @shoyer am I misunderstanding xarray's data model here? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.combine_nested() fails when passed nested DataSets 494906646 | |
535052060 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3315#issuecomment-535052060 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3315 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzNTA1MjA2MA== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-09-25T14:32:48Z | 2019-09-25T14:32:48Z | MEMBER |
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 1 } |
xr.combine_nested() fails when passed nested DataSets 494906646 | |
535010456 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3315#issuecomment-535010456 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3315 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzNTAxMDQ1Ng== | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2019-09-25T13:00:13Z | 2019-09-25T13:00:13Z | MEMBER | Okay something has definitely gone wrong here. My intention with that test was to check that the order of operations doesn't matter, but you're right that the test as written makes no sense. It would probably be a good idea to remove this test and check that property correctly by adding a second assert to the (poorly-named) Prove it works symmetricallydatasets = [[ds(0), ds(3)], [ds(1), ds(4)], [ds(2), ds(5)]] result = combine_nested(datasets, concat_dim=["dim2", "dim1"]) assert_equal(result, expected) ``` (This passes fine) However, that still leaves the question of why is this nonsensical test passing? I think it's because result = concat([da1, da2], dim="x")
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.combine_nested() fails when passed nested DataSets 494906646 | |
532794909 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3315#issuecomment-532794909 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3315 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzMjc5NDkwOQ== | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2019-09-18T17:53:43Z | 2019-09-18T17:53:43Z | MEMBER | Hmm I can look at this properly at the weekend but in the meantime the logic was motivated by discussion in #2777. If the test doesn't make sense in that context then it's not right. On Wed, 18 Sep 2019, 18:16 Deepak Cherian, notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.combine_nested() fails when passed nested DataSets 494906646 | |
532780805 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3315#issuecomment-532780805 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3315 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzMjc4MDgwNQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-09-18T17:16:36Z | 2019-09-18T17:16:36Z | MEMBER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.combine_nested() fails when passed nested DataSets 494906646 | ||
532778982 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3315#issuecomment-532778982 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3315 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzMjc3ODk4Mg== | TomNicholas 35968931 | 2019-09-18T17:11:42Z | 2019-09-18T17:11:42Z | MEMBER | Sorry when you say expected result are you referring to a particular unit test? On Wed, 18 Sep 2019, 18:07 Deepak Cherian, notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.combine_nested() fails when passed nested DataSets 494906646 | |
532777471 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3315#issuecomment-532777471 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3315 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzMjc3NzQ3MQ== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-09-18T17:07:39Z | 2019-09-18T17:07:39Z | MEMBER | This honestly makes no sense to me.
These are dataarrays with two different names. Why is this the expected result?
That error arises because it's trying to concatenate data_vars ``` da1 = xr.DataArray(name="a", data=[[0]], dims=["x", "y"]) da2 = xr.DataArray(name="a", data=[[1]], dims=["x", "y"]) da3 = xr.DataArray(name="a", data=[[2]], dims=["x", "y"]) da4 = xr.DataArray(name="a", data=[[3]], dims=["x", "y"]) ds1 = da1.to_dataset() ds2 = da2.to_dataset() ds3 = da3.to_dataset() ds4 = da4.to_dataset() xr.combine_nested([[ds1, ds2], [ds3, ds4]], concat_dim=["x", "y"]) ```
ping @TomNicholas |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xr.combine_nested() fails when passed nested DataSets 494906646 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3