issue_comments
8 rows where issue = 430214243 and user = 6213168 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- WIP: type annotations · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
481779522 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2877#issuecomment-481779522 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MTc3OTUyMg== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2019-04-10T17:11:27Z | 2019-04-10T17:11:27Z | MEMBER | @shoyer implemented all change requests except OrderedDict |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
WIP: type annotations 430214243 | |
481739493 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2877#issuecomment-481739493 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MTczOTQ5Mw== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2019-04-10T15:29:04Z | 2019-04-10T15:29:04Z | MEMBER | @shoyer I changed dimensions from str to Hashable as requested. In my opinion however it's not great, because 1. it's currently thoroughly broken due to lack of unit tests 2. it weakens type checking a lot, since Tuple is a subclass of Hashable however the vast majority of xarray functions deal with tuples with a specific code branch Please review again - in theory, common.py and util.py are now 100% done. They pass flake8 and mypy (on python 3.7). If you like them please go on and merge into Master; since the work that needs to be done is going to touch literally everything I think it's best to break it down into more manageable chunks. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
WIP: type annotations 430214243 | |
480782801 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2877#issuecomment-480782801 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MDc4MjgwMQ== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2019-04-08T10:51:35Z | 2019-04-08T10:51:35Z | MEMBER | { "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
WIP: type annotations 430214243 | ||
480767658 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2877#issuecomment-480767658 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MDc2NzY1OA== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2019-04-08T10:01:26Z | 2019-04-08T10:01:26Z | MEMBER | @shoyer I have a problem.
In Python 3.5.0-3.5.2, to create a custom typed collection you have to write
As an unrelated note, I'm observing that if I set python=3.5.3 in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
WIP: type annotations 430214243 | |
480756652 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2877#issuecomment-480756652 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MDc1NjY1Mg== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2019-04-08T09:29:29Z | 2019-04-08T09:29:29Z | MEMBER | Mmh it looks like if I run mypy in Python 3.7 I get a much terser output. Still some horrible broken things to care about, like the fact that in 3.5 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
WIP: type annotations 430214243 | |
480752288 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2877#issuecomment-480752288 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MDc1MjI4OA== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2019-04-08T09:16:51Z | 2019-04-08T09:16:51Z | MEMBER | @shoyer I am using mypy. But unlike flake8 I don't think I'll be able to integrate it in CI.
This error doesn't make any sense to me:
These I think are unfixable in Python 3.5, as I can't declare these under the class definition:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
WIP: type annotations 430214243 | |
480741636 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2877#issuecomment-480741636 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MDc0MTYzNg== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2019-04-08T08:45:42Z | 2019-04-08T08:45:42Z | MEMBER | From the 3.5.2 release notes:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
WIP: type annotations 430214243 | |
480740633 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2877#issuecomment-480740633 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2877 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ4MDc0MDYzMw== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2019-04-08T08:42:48Z | 2019-04-08T08:42:48Z | MEMBER | @shoyer how do you feel about raising the minimum Python version to 3.5.2? There's quite a bit of important stuff in it, some of which undocumented. Namely |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
WIP: type annotations 430214243 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1