issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 407523050 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Fix name loss when masking · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
462419899 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2749#issuecomment-462419899 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2749 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MjQxOTg5OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-02-11T17:35:07Z | 2019-02-11T17:35:07Z | MEMBER | thanks Yohai! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix name loss when masking 407523050 | |
462342581 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2749#issuecomment-462342581 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2749 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MjM0MjU4MQ== | yohai 6164157 | 2019-02-11T14:17:04Z | 2019-02-11T14:17:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @shoyer your fix works. I think it's ready to merge. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix name loss when masking 407523050 | |
461271787 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2749#issuecomment-461271787 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2749 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MTI3MTc4Nw== | pep8speaks 24736507 | 2019-02-07T02:59:48Z | 2019-02-11T14:16:13Z | NONE | Hello @yohai! Thanks for updating the PR. Cheers ! There are no PEP8 issues in this Pull Request. :beers: Comment last updated on February 11, 2019 at 14:16 Hours UTC |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix name loss when masking 407523050 | |
461542452 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2749#issuecomment-461542452 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2749 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MTU0MjQ1Mg== | yohai 6164157 | 2019-02-07T18:27:41Z | 2019-02-07T18:27:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I agree that my solution is a bit hacky, but from a computational cost viewpoint they are identical (or almost. I don't think there's a way to avoid one if statement per call of |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix name loss when masking 407523050 | |
461538356 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2749#issuecomment-461538356 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2749 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MTUzODM1Ng== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-02-07T18:16:03Z | 2019-02-07T18:16:03Z | MEMBER | This looks fine, though I'd rather fix this at a lower level, if possible. This line in If |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix name loss when masking 407523050 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3