issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 407523050 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Fix name loss when masking · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 462419899 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2749#issuecomment-462419899 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2749 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MjQxOTg5OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-02-11T17:35:07Z | 2019-02-11T17:35:07Z | MEMBER | thanks Yohai! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix name loss when masking 407523050 | |
| 462342581 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2749#issuecomment-462342581 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2749 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MjM0MjU4MQ== | yohai 6164157 | 2019-02-11T14:17:04Z | 2019-02-11T14:17:04Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @shoyer your fix works. I think it's ready to merge. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix name loss when masking 407523050 | |
| 461271787 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2749#issuecomment-461271787 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2749 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MTI3MTc4Nw== | pep8speaks 24736507 | 2019-02-07T02:59:48Z | 2019-02-11T14:16:13Z | NONE | Hello @yohai! Thanks for updating the PR. Cheers ! There are no PEP8 issues in this Pull Request. :beers: Comment last updated on February 11, 2019 at 14:16 Hours UTC |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix name loss when masking 407523050 | |
| 461542452 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2749#issuecomment-461542452 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2749 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MTU0MjQ1Mg== | yohai 6164157 | 2019-02-07T18:27:41Z | 2019-02-07T18:27:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I agree that my solution is a bit hacky, but from a computational cost viewpoint they are identical (or almost. I don't think there's a way to avoid one if statement per call of |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix name loss when masking 407523050 | |
| 461538356 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2749#issuecomment-461538356 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2749 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2MTUzODM1Ng== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-02-07T18:16:03Z | 2019-02-07T18:16:03Z | MEMBER | This looks fine, though I'd rather fix this at a lower level, if possible. This line in If |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Fix name loss when masking 407523050 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3