issue_comments
3 rows where issue = 308039063 and user = 6815844 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- rolling: periodic · 3 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 376145446 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2011#issuecomment-376145446 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2011 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3NjE0NTQ0Ng== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2018-03-26T12:16:12Z | 2018-03-26T12:16:12Z | MEMBER | Ah, you are right. The only way to realize rolling.periodic with dask would be to manually attach a chunk in the other side to the boundaries, construct rolling window array and then remove unnecessary boundaries by slicing. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
rolling: periodic 308039063 | |
| 375835173 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2011#issuecomment-375835173 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2011 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3NTgzNTE3Mw== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2018-03-24T01:07:32Z | 2018-03-24T01:07:32Z | MEMBER | Some comments.
We use this here https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/7c2c43ce6b1792e1193635ab9b64fd248266f632/xarray/core/dask_array_ops.py#L78-L79 I suspect this would be already working, but it would be nice if we can add some test cases.
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
rolling: periodic 308039063 | |
| 375833339 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2011#issuecomment-375833339 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2011 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3NTgzMzMzOQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2018-03-24T00:45:25Z | 2018-03-24T01:03:50Z | MEMBER | Thanks for sending a PR.
Maybe better API would be
I don't think so. I think we can keep rolling as similar to that of pandas,
and this option should be specific to
I think at least we need to add this to the docstring of |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
rolling: periodic 308039063 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1