issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 1505375386 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- implement `isnull` using `full_like` instead of `zeros_like` · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1383214949 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7395#issuecomment-1383214949 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7395 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Sci9l | dcherian 2448579 | 2023-01-15T18:07:10Z | 2023-01-15T18:07:10Z | MEMBER |
I think it'd be OK to have some compatibility code with hardcoded version numbers. It's simpler and more user-friendly than the other alternatives. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
implement `isnull` using `full_like` instead of `zeros_like` 1505375386 | |
1362191892 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7395#issuecomment-1362191892 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7395 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85RMWYU | keewis 14808389 | 2022-12-21T22:46:53Z | 2022-12-21T22:46:53Z | MEMBER | The test failures are real, unfortunately. That means that update strategies might become tricky: the new version of One way might be to have |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
implement `isnull` using `full_like` instead of `zeros_like` 1505375386 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2