issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 1444440024 and user = 14371165 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Require to explicitly defining optional dimensions such as hue and markersize · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1405634513 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7277#issuecomment-1405634513 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7277 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TyEfR | Illviljan 14371165 | 2023-01-26T20:51:43Z | 2023-01-26T20:51:43Z | MEMBER | pre-commit.ci autofix |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 1, "eyes": 0 } |
Require to explicitly defining optional dimensions such as hue and markersize 1444440024 | |
1399202401 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7277#issuecomment-1399202401 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7277 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85TZiJh | Illviljan 14371165 | 2023-01-21T07:54:29Z | 2023-01-21T07:54:29Z | MEMBER | This has stalled for long enough. I'll merge this at the end of next week unless someone disagrees, this pretty much reverts to original ds.plot.scatter behaviour because defining less than x and y in ds.plot.scatter was never allowed before anyway. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Require to explicitly defining optional dimensions such as hue and markersize 1444440024 | |
1321100829 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7277#issuecomment-1321100829 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7277 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85OvmYd | Illviljan 14371165 | 2022-11-20T11:00:50Z | 2022-11-20T11:00:50Z | MEMBER | @dcherian, as you noted in that PR as well it's not just These are the coords that we currently guess in plot1d: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/d6671dd414370d006254ba3156cb96256ce0e9c7/xarray/plot/dataarray_plot.py#L154 Should we remove them, (empty tuple) and let the user explicitly define all of them? If so should we remove any guessing in the other plot functions as well? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Require to explicitly defining optional dimensions such as hue and markersize 1444440024 | |
1310792821 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7277#issuecomment-1310792821 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7277 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85OIRx1 | Illviljan 14371165 | 2022-11-10T19:26:44Z | 2022-11-10T19:26:44Z | MEMBER | @jorisvandenbossche, feel free to try out this PR. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Require to explicitly defining optional dimensions such as hue and markersize 1444440024 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1