issue_comments
2 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 613546626 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date)
issue 1
- Revise pull request template · 2 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 643947493 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4039#issuecomment-643947493 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4039 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY0Mzk0NzQ5Mw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2020-06-15T07:12:11Z | 2020-06-15T07:12:11Z | MEMBER | OK, revised. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Revise pull request template 613546626 | |
| 624932391 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4039#issuecomment-624932391 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4039 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYyNDkzMjM5MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2020-05-06T22:54:14Z | 2020-05-06T22:54:14Z | MEMBER |
I agree, this is a nice idea. My goals were to make things simpler for new contributors and also to make whats-new a little bit for readers. Two ways we might still achieve this:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Revise pull request template 613546626 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1