issue_comments
6 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 509421390 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- fix #3141 add cumsum to DatasetGroupBy · 6 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1111474046 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3417#issuecomment-1111474046 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3417 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85CP79- | max-sixty 5635139 | 2022-04-27T20:54:24Z | 2022-04-27T20:54:24Z | MEMBER | Thanks a lot @dcherian ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix #3141 add cumsum to DatasetGroupBy 509421390 | |
1111132978 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3417#issuecomment-1111132978 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3417 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85COosy | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-04-27T15:20:27Z | 2022-04-27T15:30:08Z | MEMBER | I opened #6525 preserving commit authorship. Does that look right to everyone? I could force-push here but was afraid of losing the author info. That PR doesn't actually work, it's not clear to me why. EDIT: OK it works now, but we have the same error about losing an index |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix #3141 add cumsum to DatasetGroupBy 509421390 | |
1111119467 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3417#issuecomment-1111119467 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3417 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85COlZr | dcherian 2448579 | 2022-04-27T15:08:17Z | 2022-04-27T15:08:17Z | MEMBER | It doesn't at the moment. Writing the dask version will be fun :). We can always add |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix #3141 add cumsum to DatasetGroupBy 509421390 | |
1110601275 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3417#issuecomment-1110601275 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3417 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85CMm47 | max-sixty 5635139 | 2022-04-27T06:38:05Z | 2022-04-27T06:38:05Z | MEMBER |
Ah, great, if flox supports |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix #3141 add cumsum to DatasetGroupBy 509421390 | |
1110590762 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3417#issuecomment-1110590762 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3417 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85CMkUq | Illviljan 14371165 | 2022-04-27T06:23:02Z | 2022-04-27T06:23:02Z | MEMBER | Aren't we soon going to let flox handle this once #5734 is merged? numpy_groupies supports cumsum at least so it might be possible to support it in flox as well. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix #3141 add cumsum to DatasetGroupBy 509421390 | |
1110061422 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3417#issuecomment-1110061422 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3417 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85CKjFu | max-sixty 5635139 | 2022-04-26T17:25:29Z | 2022-04-26T17:25:29Z | MEMBER | I'm very sorry this didn't get attention — it was a good PR and it's bad of us to drop something from a first-time contributor. It was surprising that it promoted the The good news is that we simplified how methods are supplied to the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix #3141 add cumsum to DatasetGroupBy 509421390 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3