issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 462401539 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- kwargs.pop() cleanup · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
507135502 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3065#issuecomment-507135502 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3065 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNzEzNTUwMg== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2019-07-01T06:38:54Z | 2019-07-01T06:38:54Z | MEMBER | @shoyer maybe instead of percentage you can configure it to count the absolute number of lines not covered? |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
kwargs.pop() cleanup 462401539 | |
507101931 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3065#issuecomment-507101931 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3065 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNzEwMTkzMQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-07-01T03:20:58Z | 2019-07-01T03:20:58Z | MEMBER | Much cleaner! Thanks @crusaderky! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
kwargs.pop() cleanup 462401539 | |
507090258 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3065#issuecomment-507090258 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3065 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNzA5MDI1OA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-07-01T02:00:23Z | 2019-07-01T02:00:23Z | MEMBER | Thanks @crusaderky. I’m going to disable the codecov status check shortly. It’s nice to see the numbers, but it definitely is not helpful to block PRs merely because they are deleting lines of code that had test coverage! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
kwargs.pop() cleanup 462401539 | |
507079120 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3065#issuecomment-507079120 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3065 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNzA3OTEyMA== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2019-07-01T00:14:11Z | 2019-07-01T00:14:11Z | MEMBER | @shoyer all done. The worsened coverage is caused by removing a wealth of lines, so the lines that were already being missed weight more >__> |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
kwargs.pop() cleanup 462401539 | |
507036451 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3065#issuecomment-507036451 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3065 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUwNzAzNjQ1MQ== | crusaderky 6213168 | 2019-06-30T13:27:57Z | 2019-06-30T13:27:57Z | MEMBER | @shoyer ready for review and merge |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
kwargs.pop() cleanup 462401539 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3