issue_comments
6 rows where author_association = "MEMBER" and issue = 448295143 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Implement @ operator for DataArray · 6 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 497971124 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2987#issuecomment-497971124 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2987 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5Nzk3MTEyNA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-06-01T19:23:03Z | 2019-06-01T19:23:03Z | MEMBER | LMK if good to merge! (coming from the person with a terrible record of finishing PRs... 😉 ) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implement @ operator for DataArray 448295143 | |
| 496971365 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2987#issuecomment-496971365 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2987 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5Njk3MTM2NQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-05-29T14:52:49Z | 2019-05-29T14:52:49Z | MEMBER | Great - I added |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implement @ operator for DataArray 448295143 | |
| 496667122 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2987#issuecomment-496667122 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2987 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NjY2NzEyMg== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-05-28T20:01:50Z | 2019-05-28T20:01:50Z | MEMBER | It might be worth using @ instead of dot() in the docs in a few places, but I don't think it's essential to mention it specifically. On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 12:36 PM Deepak Cherian notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implement @ operator for DataArray 448295143 | |
| 496658267 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2987#issuecomment-496658267 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2987 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NjY1ODI2Nw== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-05-28T19:36:45Z | 2019-05-28T19:36:45Z | MEMBER | Do we need a line here? https://xarray.pydata.org/en/stable/computation.html#basic-array-math |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implement @ operator for DataArray 448295143 | |
| 496635695 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2987#issuecomment-496635695 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2987 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NjYzNTY5NQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-05-28T18:31:03Z | 2019-05-28T18:31:03Z | MEMBER | This looks good to me! In general, it's a good idea to also define reflexive methods, e.g., I guess this could be useful for people writing subclasses, or other objects that override arithmetic with xarray objects. So you might as well add something like:
|
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implement @ operator for DataArray 448295143 | |
| 496568423 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2987#issuecomment-496568423 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2987 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ5NjU2ODQyMw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-05-28T15:32:29Z | 2019-05-28T15:32:29Z | MEMBER | Any thoughts, team? |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Implement @ operator for DataArray 448295143 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 3