issue_comments
5 rows where author_association = "MEMBER", issue = 268264252 and user = 2443309 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- fixes for warnings related to unit tests and nan comparisons · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 340240917 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1657#issuecomment-340240917 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1657 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MDI0MDkxNw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-29T06:33:08Z | 2017-10-29T06:33:08Z | MEMBER | @shoyer - I think this is all good now. We seem to have acquired another unrelated build failures though... |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
fixes for warnings related to unit tests and nan comparisons 268264252 | |
| 340122183 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1657#issuecomment-340122183 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1657 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MDEyMjE4Mw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-27T23:44:37Z | 2017-10-27T23:44:37Z | MEMBER | @shoyer - updated. If all the tests pass, I'll merge tonight. |
{
"total_count": 1,
"+1": 1,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
fixes for warnings related to unit tests and nan comparisons 268264252 | |
| 340067233 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1657#issuecomment-340067233 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1657 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MDA2NzIzMw== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-27T19:42:33Z | 2017-10-27T19:42:33Z | MEMBER | Okay, so this knocks off the lowest hanging fruit. I'll pull the pytest error out of the travis build and we'll move forward with this. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
fixes for warnings related to unit tests and nan comparisons 268264252 | |
| 340064856 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1657#issuecomment-340064856 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1657 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0MDA2NDg1Ng== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-27T19:31:43Z | 2017-10-27T19:31:43Z | MEMBER | @shoyer - I'm wondering if we should attack #1652 in stages. The remaining warnings are going to take a bit more effort and this first block included a lot of line changes. I'm a bit concerned that if we let this sit, we will end up with a million merge conflicts. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
fixes for warnings related to unit tests and nan comparisons 268264252 | |
| 339224835 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1657#issuecomment-339224835 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1657 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDMzOTIyNDgzNQ== | jhamman 2443309 | 2017-10-25T06:08:57Z | 2017-10-25T06:08:57Z | MEMBER | Down to 96 (was 372) warnings in my py36 test environment. Two changes that I could uses some input on: 1 - Numpy element wise comparison```Python def assertEqual(self, a1, a2):
@shoyer - you and I put together the assertEqual method a while back. Do we need to check the size of arrays before comparing the values? 2 - Numpy invalid value comparisone.g.:
I'm hoping there is a succinct way of wrapping many of our nan comparing functions in |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
fixes for warnings related to unit tests and nan comparisons 268264252 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1