issue_comments
8 rows where author_association = "CONTRIBUTOR" and user = 775186 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- scottcha · 8 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1374674007 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7400#issuecomment-1374674007 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7400 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85R79xX | scottcha 775186 | 2023-01-08T00:54:31Z | 2023-01-08T00:54:31Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi, thanks for doing this @kmuehlbauer . FWIW I'm no longer seeing the issue I was previously seeing when I submitted https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3545 when I just run with released xarray v2022.12.0 (I haven't gone back further to see when the issue started going away so I'm not really sure if the old error has just been suppressed or if the single case I was seeing back then was resolved in a previous PR--or there is also a chance there is something which changed in my data over that long time period). That being said I also applied this PR to my workflow and reran the concat code and it continues to pass correctly with this PR from what I've seen so far. @kmuehlbauer did you see the tests I created here? https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/03f9b3b85aee039f47dd693322492ab09f57fb73/xarray/tests/test_concat.py Not all of them got to a passing state but there were several cases I tried to document with the tests there. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fill missing data_vars during concat by reindexing 1508009922 | |
1306152559 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3545#issuecomment-1306152559 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3545 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85N2k5v | scottcha 775186 | 2022-11-07T20:33:02Z | 2022-11-07T20:33:02Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I'm still along and yes I do still need this functionality (I still sync back to this PR when I have data missing vars). The issue was that the technical requirements got beyond what I was able to account for with the time I had available. If you or someone else was interested in picking it up I'd be happy to evaluate against my use cases. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add defaults during concat 508 524043729 | |
586629198 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3545#issuecomment-586629198 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3545 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU4NjYyOTE5OA== | scottcha 775186 | 2020-02-15T18:38:25Z | 2020-02-15T18:38:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I just pushed an incomplete set of changes as @kmuehlbauer tests have demonstrated there was some incomplete cases the PR still isn't handling. I'm not sure I have my head wrapped around xarray enough to address @dcherian's latest comments though which is why i'm sharing the code at this point. All tests are passing except the new cases which were pointed out. I'll try to continue to get time to update this but wanted to at least provide this status update at this point as its been awhile. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add defaults during concat 508 524043729 | |
577773353 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3545#issuecomment-577773353 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3545 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3Nzc3MzM1Mw== | scottcha 775186 | 2020-01-23T17:00:06Z | 2020-01-23T17:01:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @kmuehlbauer @dcherian @shoyer If it would be easier it could abandon this PR and resubmit a new one as the code has drastically changed since the original comments were provided? Essentially I'm waiting for feedback or approval of this PR. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add defaults during concat 508 524043729 | |
569842806 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3545#issuecomment-569842806 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3545 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2OTg0MjgwNg== | scottcha 775186 | 2019-12-31T01:18:35Z | 2019-12-31T01:18:35Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hi, I've provided a new update to this PR (sorry it took me awhile both to get more familiar with the code and find the time to update the PR). I improved the logic to be a bit more performant and handle more edge cases as well as updated the test suite. I have a few questions:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add defaults during concat 508 524043729 | |
555791968 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3545#issuecomment-555791968 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3545 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NTc5MTk2OA== | scottcha 775186 | 2019-11-20T01:22:51Z | 2019-11-20T01:22:51Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ok, I'll work on extending the updates with the feedback and additional tests. Thanks! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add defaults during concat 508 524043729 | |
553993804 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/508#issuecomment-553993804 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/508 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1Mzk5MzgwNA== | scottcha 775186 | 2019-11-14T17:30:09Z | 2019-11-14T17:30:09Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ok got it, I'll take a look and spin up a PR. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets? 98587746 | |
553709888 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/508#issuecomment-553709888 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/508 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MzcwOTg4OA== | scottcha 775186 | 2019-11-14T03:37:59Z | 2019-11-14T04:09:02Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I just ran in to this issue. While the previous fix seems to handle one case it doesn't handle all the cases. Before I clean this up and open a new PR does this look like its on the right track (it worked for my issue where I was concating multiple datasets which always had the same dims and coordinates but sometimes were missing variables)? starts at line 353 on concat.py
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Ignore missing variables when concatenating datasets? 98587746 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 3