issues
6 rows where state = "open", type = "issue" and user = 1386642 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: comments, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
416962458 | MDU6SXNzdWU0MTY5NjI0NTg= | 2799 | Performance: numpy indexes small amounts of data 1000 faster than xarray | nbren12 1386642 | open | 0 | 42 | 2019-03-04T19:44:17Z | 2024-03-18T17:51:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Machine learning applications often require iterating over every index along some of the dimensions of a dataset. For instance, iterating over all the I made some simplified benchmarks, which show that xarray is about 1000 times slower than numpy when repeatedly grabbing a small amount of data from an array. This is a problem with both While python will always be slower than C when iterating over an array in this fashion, I would hope that xarray could be nearly as fast as numpy. I am not sure what the best way to improve this is though. |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2799/reactions", "total_count": 9, "+1": 9, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||||
1473152374 | I_kwDOAMm_X85XzoV2 | 7348 | Using entry_points to register dataset and dataarray accessors? | nbren12 1386642 | open | 0 | 4 | 2022-12-02T16:48:42Z | 2023-09-14T19:53:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Is your feature request related to a problem?External libraries often use the dataset/dataarray accessor pattern (e.g. metpy). These accessors are not available until importing the external package where the registration occurs. This means scripts using these accessors must include an often-unused import that linters will complain about e.g. ``` import metpy # linter complains here some datads: xr.Dataset = ... ds.metpy.... ``` Describe the solution you'd likeUse importlib entrypoints to register these as entrypoints so that registration is automatically handled. This is currently enabled for the array backend, but not for accessors (e.g. metpy's setup.cfg). Describe alternatives you've consideredNo response Additional contextNo response |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7348/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 1 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||||
753852119 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NTM4NTIxMTk= | 4628 | Lazy concatenation of arrays | nbren12 1386642 | open | 0 | 5 | 2020-11-30T22:32:08Z | 2022-05-10T17:02:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Concatenating xarray objects forces the data to load. I recently learned about this object allowing lazy indexing into an DataArrays/sets without using dask. Concatenation along a single dimension is the inverse operation of slicing, so it seems natural to also support it. Also, concatenating along dimensions (e.g. "run"/"simulation"/"ensemble") can be a common merging workflow. Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
One could rename the variables in a and b to allow them to be merged (e.g. Additional context This is useful when not using dask for performance reasons (e.g. using another parallelism engine like Apache Beam). |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4628/reactions", "total_count": 8, "+1": 8, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||||
588112617 | MDU6SXNzdWU1ODgxMTI2MTc= | 3894 | Add public API for Dataset._copy_listed | nbren12 1386642 | open | 0 | 15 | 2020-03-26T02:39:34Z | 2022-04-18T16:41:39Z | CONTRIBUTOR | In my data pipelines, I have been repeatedly burned using indexing notation to grab a few variables from a dataset in the following way:
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3894/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||||
224846826 | MDU6SXNzdWUyMjQ4NDY4MjY= | 1387 | FacetGrid with independent colorbars | nbren12 1386642 | open | 0 | 7 | 2017-04-27T16:47:44Z | 2022-04-13T11:07:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Sometimes the magnitude of a variable can vary dramatically across a given coordinate, which makes 2d plots generated by xr.FacetGrid difficult to interpret. It would be useful if an option to xr.FacetGrid could be specified which allows each subplot to have its own colorbar. |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1387/reactions", "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||||
1132894350 | I_kwDOAMm_X85DhpiO | 6269 | Adding CDL Parser/`open_cdl`? | nbren12 1386642 | open | 0 | 7 | 2022-02-11T17:31:36Z | 2022-02-14T17:18:38Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Is your feature request related to a problem?No. Describe the solution you'd likeIt would be nice to load/generate xarray datasets from Common Data Language (CDL) descriptions. CDL is a DSL that that defines a netCDF dataset, and is quite nice for testing. We use it to build mock datasets for e.g. integration testing of plotting routines/complex data analysis etc. CDL provides a concise format for storing the schema of this data. This schema can be used for validation or generation (using the CLI CDL is basically the format produced by I wrote a small pure python parser for CDL last night and it seems work! There are similar projects on github. Sadly, these projects seem to be abandoned so it would be nice to attach to an effort like xarray. Describe alternatives you've consideredSome kind of Additional contextNo response |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6269/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | issue |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [state_reason] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);