issues: 753852119
This data as json
| id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 753852119 | MDU6SXNzdWU3NTM4NTIxMTk= | 4628 | Lazy concatenation of arrays | 1386642 | open | 0 | 5 | 2020-11-30T22:32:08Z | 2022-05-10T17:02:34Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe. Concatenating xarray objects forces the data to load. I recently learned about this object allowing lazy indexing into an DataArrays/sets without using dask. Concatenation along a single dimension is the inverse operation of slicing, so it seems natural to also support it. Also, concatenating along dimensions (e.g. "run"/"simulation"/"ensemble") can be a common merging workflow. Describe the solution you'd like
Describe alternatives you've considered
One could rename the variables in a and b to allow them to be merged (e.g. Additional context This is useful when not using dask for performance reasons (e.g. using another parallelism engine like Apache Beam). |
{
"url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4628/reactions",
"total_count": 8,
"+1": 8,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
13221727 | issue |