home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issues

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issues

10 rows where repo = 13221727 and user = 479480 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: comments, draft, created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)

type 2

  • pull 7
  • issue 3

state 2

  • closed 6
  • open 4

repo 1

  • xarray · 10 ✖
id node_id number title user state locked assignee milestone comments created_at updated_at ▲ closed_at author_association active_lock_reason draft pull_request body reactions performed_via_github_app state_reason repo type
2266442492 PR_kwDOAMm_X85t4NhR 8976 Migration of datatree/ops.py -> datatree_ops.py flamingbear 479480 closed 0     4 2024-04-26T20:14:11Z 2024-05-02T19:49:39Z 2024-05-02T19:49:39Z CONTRIBUTOR   0 pydata/xarray/pulls/8976

I considered wedging this into core/ops.py, but it didn't look like it fit there.

This is a basic lift and shift from datatree_/ops.py to core/datatree_ops.py

I did fix the document addendum injection and added a couple of tests.

  • [x] Contributes to migration step for miscellaneous modules in Track merging datatree into xarray #8572
  • [x] Tests added
  • [x] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in whats-new.rst
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8976/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 pull
2266443797 PR_kwDOAMm_X85t4Nzs 8977 preliminary pr to examine the DataTree injected docs. flamingbear 479480 open 0     5 2024-04-26T20:15:22Z 2024-04-26T22:36:00Z   CONTRIBUTOR   1 pydata/xarray/pulls/8977

This PR should never be merged, it is opened only to run the build-the-docs with the changes from #8976

I just wanted to make sure I could point to what the final doc pages will look like when datatree is released.

{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8977/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 pull
2248692681 PR_kwDOAMm_X85s8dDt 8953 stop pruning datatree_ directory from distribution flamingbear 479480 closed 0     0 2024-04-17T16:14:13Z 2024-04-23T15:39:06Z 2024-04-23T15:35:20Z CONTRIBUTOR   0 pydata/xarray/pulls/8953

This PR removes the directive that strips out the datatree_ directory from the xarray distribution.

It also cleans a few typing errors and removes exceptions for the datatree_ directory for mypy.

It does NOT remove the exception for pre-commit config.

  • [X] Closes #8768
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8953/reactions",
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 1,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 pull
2257054431 I_kwDOAMm_X86Gh-rf 8963 datatree ops.py migration cleanup flamingbear 479480 open 0     0 2024-04-22T17:06:36Z 2024-04-22T18:23:31Z   CONTRIBUTOR      

What is your issue?

During the 3/26/2024 design discussion meeting (#8747), we discussed the monkey patching of methods that was required to wrap datatree nodes with the desired Xarray API function. This was a primarily done as a necessity due to the datatree code not living in the xarray repository. The better implementation could be to add the wrapping to xarray's generate_aggregations.py module. The ultimate decision made by Stephan and Tom was to add this as a future issue (this one) and migrate the file as is for now.

{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8963/reactions",
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 issue
2187399013 I_kwDOAMm_X86CYQ9l 8836 DataTree should support Hashable names. flamingbear 479480 open 0     0 2024-03-14T22:37:09Z 2024-03-15T04:57:44Z   CONTRIBUTOR      

What is your issue?

In porting xarray-contrib/datatree into pydata/xarray. We discovered some type mismatches.

The general feeling was that we should support Hashable in order to improve DataTree interactions with Dataset and DataArrays.

The quick solution of changing the name type to Hashable in NamedNode fails quickly because of it's PathPurePath inheritance.

This issue just tracks that we want to come back to this.

{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8836/reactions",
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 issue
2167879988 I_kwDOAMm_X86BNzk0 8807 Collection of breaking changes in Datatree occurring during the migration from xarray-contrib/datatree into pydata/xarray proper flamingbear 479480 open 0     3 2024-03-04T22:14:10Z 2024-03-04T22:57:49Z   CONTRIBUTOR      

What is your issue?

This is an Issue to keep track of changes that have been made to DataTree from the initial migration

{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8807/reactions",
    "total_count": 2,
    "+1": 2,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 issue
2110363401 PR_kwDOAMm_X85llc-6 8688 datatree import (clean) flamingbear 479480 closed 0     4 2024-01-31T15:26:44Z 2024-03-01T11:00:48Z 2024-01-31T18:19:43Z CONTRIBUTOR   0 pydata/xarray/pulls/8688

This is the exact same steps followed in #8656

But hopefully with a clean history.

I am copying the notes from the previous PR below.

https://github.com/flamingbear/rewritten-datatree is the version of datatree that was m erged in this PR.


Previous PR notes This PR imports xarray-contrib/datatree and its history to pydata/xarray/xarray/datatree_

Step one of issue #8572. This imports the datatree code without exposing DataTree as a public API.

git filter repo https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo was used to preserve some history for the merge.

Datatree tags were renamed to legacy-datatree-{tag}:

shell git filter-repo --tag-rename '':'legacy-datatree-'

Links to xarray-contrib/datatree original PRs are preserved by rewriting the messages using a replace-message file.

``` text

standard github style pull request (#39)

regex:(#(\d+))==>https://github.com/xarray-contrib/datatree/pull/\1

"Merge pull request #11 from TomNicholas/single_datanode_class"

regex:pull request #(\d+)==>https://github.com/xarray-contrib/datatree/pull/\1 ```

Links to the xarray-contrib/datatree Issues are preserved with a replace-text file.

``` text

standard comment change " # see issue #38"

regex:(\s?#.[ ])#(\d+)==>\1https://github.com/xarray-contrib/datatree/issues/\2

also " @pytest.mark.xfail(reason="Indexing needs to return whole tree (GH #77)")"

regex:((GH #(\d+)))==>(GH https://github.com/xarray-contrib/datatree/issues/\2) ```

The datatree repo was relocated to a subdirectory

shell git-filter-repo --to-subdirectory xarray/datatree_

and the prepared datatree repository was added as a remote and merged into xarray.

shell git merge prepared-datatree/main --no-commit --allow-unrelated-histories

This should allow work to begin on the rest of the steps in #8572

{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8688/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 pull
2137443514 PR_kwDOAMm_X85nBoy_ 8757 Migrate treenode module. flamingbear 479480 closed 0     6 2024-02-15T21:04:11Z 2024-02-28T22:02:31Z 2024-02-27T16:40:19Z CONTRIBUTOR   0 pydata/xarray/pulls/8757

Migrate datatree's treenode module the base class representing node of a tree, with methods for accessing nodes and traversal.

  • [X] completes step 2 datatree/treenode.py #8572
  • [x] Tests added or updated
  • [N/A] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in whats-new.rst
  • [X] Internal Changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in whats-new.rst
  • [N/A] New functions/methods are listed in api.rst
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8757/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 pull
2115733488 PR_kwDOAMm_X85l4Aq8 8697 add open_datatree to xarray flamingbear 479480 closed 0     18 2024-02-02T20:20:03Z 2024-02-14T23:41:03Z 2024-02-14T21:50:29Z CONTRIBUTOR   0 pydata/xarray/pulls/8697

Draft: I'd like to open this up and start a discussion on a couple of things.

Here is a first stab at adding open_datatree to the backend of xarray.

  1. ~~I'm not sure which tests to migrate/write with this change. The only datatree tests that have open_datatree are the ones in tests/test_io.py. While those (and all of the datatree tests) run and pass, they are still located in _datatree, and they don't seem to fit in the test_backends.py. I do see that Tom did a good job of naming the tests so that they would fit with the existing tests in many places.~~ Migrated tests over into xarray/tests/datatree once approved and merged can be added into the existing tests where appropriate (from Tom).
  2. I was able to open datatrees with each of the engines, netcdf4, h5netcdf and zarr.
  3. I haven't moved any documentation. I remember hearing that we could add it and mark it as experimental? Is that the correct way forward?

No check boxes checked yet. - [ ] Closes part of first bullet of https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/8572 - [ ] Tests added - [ ] User visible changes (including notable bug fixes) are documented in whats-new.rst - [ ] New functions/methods are listed in api.rst

{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8697/reactions",
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 1,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 pull
2098617770 PR_kwDOAMm_X85k-Koy 8656 Datatree import flamingbear 479480 closed 0     28 2024-01-24T16:17:02Z 2024-01-31T18:42:28Z 2024-01-31T18:20:19Z CONTRIBUTOR   0 pydata/xarray/pulls/8656

This PR imports xarray-contrib/datatree and its history to pydata/xarray/xarray/datatree_

Step one of issue #8572. This imports the datatree code without exposing DataTree as a public API.

git filter repo https://github.com/newren/git-filter-repo was used to preserve some history for the merge.

Datatree tags were renamed to legacy-datatree-{tag}:

shell git filter-repo --tag-rename '':'legacy-datatree-'

Links to xarray-contrib/datatree original PRs are preserved by rewriting the messages using a replace-message file.

``` text

standard github style pull request (#39)

regex:(#(\d+))==>https://github.com/xarray-contrib/datatree/pull/\1

"Merge pull request #11 from TomNicholas/single_datanode_class"

regex:pull request #(\d+)==>https://github.com/xarray-contrib/datatree/pull/\1 ```

Links to the xarray-contrib/datatree Issues are preserved with a replace-text file.

``` text

standard comment change " # see issue #38"

regex:(\s?#.[ ])#(\d+)==>\1https://github.com/xarray-contrib/datatree/issues/\2

also " @pytest.mark.xfail(reason="Indexing needs to return whole tree (GH #77)")"

regex:((GH #(\d+)))==>(GH https://github.com/xarray-contrib/datatree/issues/\2) ```

The datatree repo was relocated to a subdirectory

shell git-filter-repo --to-subdirectory xarray/datatree_

and the prepared datatree repository was added as a remote and merged into xarray.

shell git merge prepared-datatree/main --no-commit --allow-unrelated-histories

This should allow work to begin on the rest of the steps in #8572

{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8656/reactions",
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 1,
    "eyes": 0
}
    xarray 13221727 pull

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issues] (
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [number] INTEGER,
   [title] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [state] TEXT,
   [locked] INTEGER,
   [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]),
   [comments] INTEGER,
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [closed_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [active_lock_reason] TEXT,
   [draft] INTEGER,
   [pull_request] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [state_reason] TEXT,
   [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]),
   [type] TEXT
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo]
    ON [issues] ([repo]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone]
    ON [issues] ([milestone]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee]
    ON [issues] ([assignee]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user]
    ON [issues] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 31.671ms · About: xarray-datasette