issues
7 rows where comments = 6, type = "pull" and user = 5635139 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1878288525 | PR_kwDOAMm_X85ZYos5 | 8139 | Fix pandas' `interpolate(fill_value=)` error | max-sixty 5635139 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2023-09-02T02:41:45Z | 2023-09-28T16:48:51Z | 2023-09-04T18:05:14Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/8139 | Pandas no longer has a Weirdly I wasn't getting this locally, on pandas 2.1.0, only in CI on https://github.com/pydata/xarray/actions/runs/6054400455/job/16431747966?pr=8138. Removing it passes locally, let's see whether this works in CI Would close #8125 |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/8139/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
967854972 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NzEwMDA1NzY4 | 5694 | Ask PRs to annotate tests | max-sixty 5635139 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2021-08-12T02:19:28Z | 2023-09-28T16:46:19Z | 2023-06-19T05:46:36Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/5694 |
As discussed https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5690#issuecomment-897280353 |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5694/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
729208432 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0NTA5NzM0NTM2 | 4540 | numpy_groupies | max-sixty 5635139 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2020-10-26T03:37:19Z | 2022-02-05T22:24:12Z | 2021-10-24T00:18:52Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/4540 |
Very early effort — I found this harder than I expected — I was trying to use the existing groupby infra, but think I maybe should start afresh. The result of the I also added some type signature / notes and I was going through the existing code; mostly for my own understanding If anyone has any thoughts, feel free to comment — otherwise I'll resume this soon |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4540/reactions", "total_count": 4, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 2, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
399164733 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MjQ0NjU3NTk5 | 2674 | Skipping variables in datasets that don't have the core dim | max-sixty 5635139 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2019-01-15T02:43:11Z | 2021-05-13T22:02:19Z | 2021-05-13T22:02:19Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/2674 | ref https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/2650#issuecomment-454164295 This seems an ugly way of accomplishing the goal; any ideas for a better way of doing this? And stepping back, do others think a) it's helpful to skip variables in a dataset, and b) |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2674/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
575088962 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MzgzMzAwMjgw | 3826 | Allow ellipsis to be used in stack | max-sixty 5635139 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2020-03-04T02:21:21Z | 2020-03-20T01:20:54Z | 2020-03-19T22:55:09Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/3826 |
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3826/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
577283480 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mzg1MTA3OTU4 | 3846 | Doctests fixes | max-sixty 5635139 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2020-03-07T05:44:27Z | 2020-03-10T14:03:05Z | 2020-03-10T14:03:00Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/3846 |
Starting to get some fixes in. It's going to be a long journey though. I think maybe we whitelist some files and move gradually through before whitelisting the whole library. |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3846/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
457080809 | MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0Mjg4OTY1MzQ4 | 3029 | Fix pandas-dev tests | max-sixty 5635139 | closed | 0 | 6 | 2019-06-17T18:15:16Z | 2019-06-28T15:31:33Z | 2019-06-28T15:31:28Z | MEMBER | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/3029 | Currently pandas-dev tests get 'stuck' on the conda install. The last instruction to run is the standard install:
And after installing the libraries, it prints this and then stops:
I'm not that familiar with conda. Anyone have any ideas as to why this would fail while the other builds would succeed? |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3029/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [state_reason] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);