issues
8 rows where comments = 4 and user = 43316012 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date), closed_at (date)
id | node_id | number | title | user | state | locked | assignee | milestone | comments | created_at | updated_at ▲ | closed_at | author_association | active_lock_reason | draft | pull_request | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | state_reason | repo | type |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1620317764 | PR_kwDOAMm_X85L1Yr2 | 7612 | Fix `pcolormesh` with str coords | headtr1ck 43316012 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2023-03-12T10:50:35Z | 2023-09-13T18:48:08Z | 2023-03-16T18:55:30Z | COLLABORATOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/7612 |
|
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7612/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
1581313830 | PR_kwDOAMm_X85Jy8wm | 7523 | allow refreshing of backends | headtr1ck 43316012 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2023-02-12T16:07:05Z | 2023-09-13T18:46:56Z | 2023-03-31T15:14:56Z | COLLABORATOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/7523 |
Don't know yet how to effectively test this, I guess there is some tricky solution with some mocking. |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7523/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
1419825696 | I_kwDOAMm_X85UoNIg | 7199 | Deprecate cfgrib backend | headtr1ck 43316012 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2022-10-23T15:09:14Z | 2023-03-29T15:19:53Z | 2023-03-29T15:19:53Z | COLLABORATOR | What is your issue?Since cfgrib 0.9.9 (04/2021) it comes with its own xarray backend plugin (looks mainly like a copy of our internal version). We should deprecate our internal plugin. The deprecation is complicated since we usually bind the minimum version to a minor step, but cfgrib seems to be on 0.9 since 4 years already. Maybye an exception like for netCDF4? Anyway, if we decide to leave it as it is for now, this ticket is just a reminder to remove it someday :) |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7199/reactions", "total_count": 4, "+1": 4, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||
1464905814 | I_kwDOAMm_X85XULBW | 7322 | Doctests failing | headtr1ck 43316012 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2022-11-25T20:20:29Z | 2022-11-28T19:31:04Z | 2022-11-28T19:31:04Z | COLLABORATOR | What is your issue?It seems that some update in urllib3 causes our doctests to fail. The reason seems to be that botocore uses an interesting construction to import deprecated urllib3 things:
I assume that this fails because we use Not sure if this is an issue with botocore or we have to catch this? |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7322/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | xarray 13221727 | issue | ||||||
1386709376 | PR_kwDOAMm_X84_o-IX | 7089 | Fix deepcopy of Variables and DataArrays | headtr1ck 43316012 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2022-09-26T20:54:16Z | 2022-09-29T20:46:01Z | 2022-09-29T16:36:51Z | COLLABORATOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/7089 |
related to #2839 |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7089/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
1251511305 | PR_kwDOAMm_X844nz8j | 6651 | Typing support for custom backends | headtr1ck 43316012 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2022-05-28T07:28:41Z | 2022-06-04T10:17:55Z | 2022-05-28T10:29:16Z | COLLABORATOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/6651 |
So far we have not found a good way of typing dynamically added custom backends (installed via pip). So the only fallback option is to allow str. I have decided to leave the Literal as type, since it gives the user a nice list of supported backends in the editor. |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6651/reactions", "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
1260041574 | PR_kwDOAMm_X845E39t | 6661 | Typing of Dataset | headtr1ck 43316012 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2022-06-03T15:22:24Z | 2022-06-04T10:17:48Z | 2022-06-04T04:26:03Z | COLLABORATOR | 0 | pydata/xarray/pulls/6661 |
Feel free to wait with merging after the 2022.05.0.dev0 release :)
If anyone has some typing expertise: I think that the way align is typed is wrong. The current implementation only works for aligning a sequence of objects of the same type, but not mixed DataArrays and Datasets. In some placed I had to add some "#type: ignore"s... I should probably open an issue for that. |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6661/reactions", "total_count": 3, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 3, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray 13221727 | pull | |||||
1222215528 | I_kwDOAMm_X85I2Ydo | 6555 | sortby with ascending=False should create an index | headtr1ck 43316012 | closed | 0 | 4 | 2022-05-01T16:57:51Z | 2022-05-01T22:17:50Z | 2022-05-01T22:17:50Z | COLLABORATOR | Is your feature request related to a problem?When using If an explicit index (like [0, 1, 2]) exists, it gets correctly reordered and allowes correct aligning. Describe the solution you'd likeFor consistency with aligning xarray should create a new index that indicates that the data has been reordered, i.e. [2, 1, 0]. Only downside: this will break code that relies on non-existent indexes. Describe alternatives you've consideredNo response Additional contextNo response |
{ "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6555/reactions", "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
completed | xarray 13221727 | issue |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issues] ( [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [number] INTEGER, [title] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [state] TEXT, [locked] INTEGER, [assignee] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [milestone] INTEGER REFERENCES [milestones]([id]), [comments] INTEGER, [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [closed_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [active_lock_reason] TEXT, [draft] INTEGER, [pull_request] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [state_reason] TEXT, [repo] INTEGER REFERENCES [repos]([id]), [type] TEXT ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_repo] ON [issues] ([repo]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_milestone] ON [issues] ([milestone]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_assignee] ON [issues] ([assignee]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issues_user] ON [issues] ([user]);