issues: 271991268

This data as json

id node_id number title user state locked assignee milestone comments created_at updated_at closed_at author_association active_lock_reason draft pull_request body reactions performed_via_github_app state_reason repo type
271991268 MDExOlB1bGxSZXF1ZXN0MTUxMjMyOTA2 1696 ffill & bfill methods 5635139 closed 0     4 2017-11-07T21:32:19Z 2017-11-12T00:14:33Z 2017-11-12T00:14:29Z MEMBER   0 pydata/xarray/pulls/1696
  • [x] Closes #1651
  • [x] Tests added / passed
  • [ ] Passes git diff upstream/master **/*py | flake8 --diff
  • [ ] Fully documented, including whats-new.rst for all changes and api.rst for new API

No docs / docstrings. No backfill.

But otherwise is this a reasonable layout? Do we prefer fillna with options (back / forward / replacement), or ffill, bfill, fillna?

 
{
    "url": "https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1696/reactions",
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
     13221727 pull

Links from other tables