issue_comments
3 rows where user = 895458 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- mwtoews · 3 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1302724471 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/7253#issuecomment-1302724471 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7253 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Npf93 | mwtoews 895458 | 2022-11-03T22:01:49Z | 2022-11-03T22:01:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I've looked into this further, and what I see is that As for the updated format with a numeric match, I don't think it makes any difference. Testing with git 2.38.1:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove setuptools-scm-git-archive, require setuptools-scm>=7 1434498245 | |
1242590184 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/6979#issuecomment-1242590184 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6979 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85KEGvo | mwtoews 895458 | 2022-09-10T01:37:43Z | 2022-09-10T01:37:43Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
My guess is that it hasn't been needed since #4519 when MANIFEST.in was cleaned up by @max-sixty. It hasn't been needed since #3714. Also, from the check-manifest docs here:
Is this relevant? From my laptop, check-manifest takes ~10 seconds to compute. What value does it bring to CI checking? |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Remove unnecessary build dependencies, use build defaults, strict twine check 1359451944 | |
950734046 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/5879#issuecomment-950734046 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5879 | IC_kwDOAMm_X844qwze | mwtoews 895458 | 2021-10-25T09:46:37Z | 2021-10-25T09:46:37Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @max-sixty whats-new entry added, check to see if the paragraph is ok. I'll hold off clarifying file-like vs path-like in the docs for now, but will consider a doc intersphinx link at some time. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Check for path-like objects rather than Path type, use os.fspath 1031275532 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 3