issue_comments
26 rows where user = 302469 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- QuLogic · 26 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1538068408 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6854#issuecomment-1538068408 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6854 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85brQ-4 | QuLogic 302469 | 2023-05-08T09:42:08Z | 2023-05-08T09:42:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I think this was fixed by https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf-c/issues/2573 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_open_nczarr uses too much memory 1323734180 | |
1382625582 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6854#issuecomment-1382625582 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6854 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85SaTEu | QuLogic 302469 | 2023-01-14T01:33:08Z | 2023-01-14T01:33:08Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Building against netcdf with the patch backported by @opoplawski, I now get a single failure: ``` ____ TestNCZarr.testopen_nczarr ______ [gw3] linux -- Python 3.11.1 /usr/bin/python3 zarr_obj = <zarr.core.Array '/dim2' (9,) float64 read-only> dimension_key = '_ARRAY_DIMENSIONS', try_nczarr = True def _get_zarr_dims_and_attrs(zarr_obj, dimension_key, try_nczarr): # Zarr arrays do not have dimensions. To get around this problem, we add # an attribute that specifies the dimension. We have to hide this attribute # when we send the attributes to the user. # zarr_obj can be either a zarr group or zarr array try: # Xarray-Zarr
self = <zarr.attrs.Attributes object at 0x7f697d934ad0> item = '_ARRAY_DIMENSIONS' def getitem(self, item):
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-xarray-2022.12.0-1.fc38.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xarray/backends/zarr.py:819: in open_zarr ds = open_dataset( /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-xarray-2022.12.0-1.fc38.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xarray/backends/api.py:540: in open_dataset backend_ds = backend.open_dataset( /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-xarray-2022.12.0-1.fc38.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xarray/backends/zarr.py:897: in open_dataset ds = store_entrypoint.open_dataset( /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-xarray-2022.12.0-1.fc38.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xarray/backends/store.py:28: in open_dataset vars, attrs = store.load() /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-xarray-2022.12.0-1.fc38.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xarray/backends/common.py:128: in load (_decode_variable_name(k), v) for k, v in self.get_variables().items() /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-xarray-2022.12.0-1.fc38.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xarray/backends/zarr.py:480: in get_variables return FrozenDict( /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-xarray-2022.12.0-1.fc38.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xarray/core/utils.py:469: in FrozenDict return Frozen(dict(args, *kwargs)) /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-xarray-2022.12.0-1.fc38.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xarray/backends/zarr.py:481: in <genexpr> (k, self.open_store_variable(k, v)) for k, v in self.zarr_group.arrays() /builddir/build/BUILDROOT/python-xarray-2022.12.0-1.fc38.x86_64/usr/lib/python3.11/site-packages/xarray/backends/zarr.py:457: in open_store_variable dimensions, attributes = _get_zarr_dims_and_attrs( zarr_obj = <zarr.core.Array '/dim2' (9,) float64 read-only>
dimension_key = '_ARRAY_DIMENSIONS', try_nczarr = True
def _get_zarr_dims_and_attrs(zarr_obj, dimension_key, try_nczarr):
# Zarr arrays do not have dimensions. To get around this problem, we add
# an attribute that specifies the dimension. We have to hide this attribute
# when we send the attributes to the user.
# zarr_obj can be either a zarr group or zarr array
try:
# Xarray-Zarr
dimensions = zarr_obj.attrs[dimension_key]
except KeyError as e:
if not try_nczarr:
raise KeyError(
f"Zarr object is missing the attribute
Does that look like a problem in netcdf or a problem in xarray here? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_open_nczarr uses too much memory 1323734180 | |
1330143162 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6854#issuecomment-1330143162 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6854 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85PSF-6 | QuLogic 302469 | 2022-11-29T06:21:17Z | 2022-11-29T06:21:17Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I could, but I'm not sure what to try. I tried running https://github.com/Unidata/netcdf4-python/blob/master/examples/tutorial.py with those versions and that worked without issue. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_open_nczarr uses too much memory 1323734180 | |
1328135253 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6854#issuecomment-1328135253 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6854 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85PKbxV | QuLogic 302469 | 2022-11-26T23:57:28Z | 2022-11-26T23:57:28Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Still broken in 2022.11.0; any ideas what to look at here? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_open_nczarr uses too much memory 1323734180 | |
1233350295 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6941#issuecomment-1233350295 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6941 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Jg26X | QuLogic 302469 | 2022-08-31T19:44:24Z | 2022-08-31T19:44:24Z | CONTRIBUTOR | IIUC, I think this is the exception those tests are trying to check: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/blob/4880012ddee9e43e3e18e95551876e9c182feafb/xarray/plot/utils.py#L893-L896 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
⚠️ Nightly upstream-dev CI failed ⚠️ 1345644028 | |
1233345322 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6941#issuecomment-1233345322 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6941 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Jg1sq | QuLogic 302469 | 2022-08-31T19:38:24Z | 2022-08-31T19:38:24Z | CONTRIBUTOR | We looked at this downstream in Matplotlib to see if we introduced something in 3.6.0rc2. There was a bug there in that exception types changed unexpectedly. However, I am thinking that these two tests are incorrect. They are generically checking for |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
⚠️ Nightly upstream-dev CI failed ⚠️ 1345644028 | |
1200757563 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6854#issuecomment-1200757563 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6854 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85Hkhs7 | QuLogic 302469 | 2022-08-01T06:14:42Z | 2022-08-01T06:14:42Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Backporting netcdf 4.9.0 to Fedora 36 also OOMs, so there's something weird there, but not sure if it's netCDF, or something that xarray is doing. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_open_nczarr uses too much memory 1323734180 | |
1200657104 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/6854#issuecomment-1200657104 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/6854 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85HkJLQ | QuLogic 302469 | 2022-08-01T03:35:39Z | 2022-08-01T03:35:39Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Hmm, I seem to be able to build on Fedora 36 (instead of Rawhide above), with the following versions:
INSTALLED VERSIONS
------------------
commit: None
python: 3.10.5 (main, Jun 9 2022, 00:00:00) [GCC 12.1.1 20220507 (Red Hat 12.1.1-1)]
python-bits: 64
OS: Linux
OS-release: 5.17.13-300.fc36.x86_64
machine: x86_64
processor: x86_64
byteorder: little
LC_ALL: None
LANG: C.UTF-8
LOCALE: ('en_US', 'UTF-8')
libhdf5: 1.12.1
libnetcdf: 4.8.1
xarray: 2022.6.0
pandas: 1.3.5
numpy: 1.22.0
scipy: 1.8.1
netCDF4: 1.5.8
pydap: None
h5netcdf: None
h5py: None
Nio: None
zarr: 2.11.3
cftime: 1.5.2
nc_time_axis: None
PseudoNetCDF: None
rasterio: 1.2.10
cfgrib: None
iris: None
bottleneck: 1.3.2
dask: 2022.05.0
distributed: None
matplotlib: 3.5.2
cartopy: None
seaborn: 0.11.1
numbagg: None
fsspec: 2022.5.0
cupy: None
pint: 0.16.1
sparse: None
flox: None
numpy_groupies: None
setuptools: 59.6.0
pip: 21.3.1
conda: None
pytest: 6.2.5
IPython: None
sphinx: 4.4.0
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_open_nczarr uses too much memory 1323734180 | |
953335057 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5901#issuecomment-953335057 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5901 | IC_kwDOAMm_X8440r0R | QuLogic 302469 | 2021-10-27T21:45:41Z | 2021-10-27T21:45:41Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Have you tried with the latest Cartopy? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Spurious lines of the pcolormesh example 1037814301 | |
873660034 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5342#issuecomment-873660034 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5342 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg3MzY2MDAzNA== | QuLogic 302469 | 2021-07-04T20:50:24Z | 2021-07-04T20:50:24Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
This should go in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_push_dask fails type inference 895202415 | |
845413014 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5342#issuecomment-845413014 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5342 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0NTQxMzAxNA== | QuLogic 302469 | 2021-05-20T19:24:36Z | 2021-05-20T19:24:36Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ah, you're right, it's still 1.2.1, I'll fix that. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_push_dask fails type inference 895202415 | |
844764616 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/5342#issuecomment-844764616 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/5342 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDg0NDc2NDYxNg== | QuLogic 302469 | 2021-05-20T06:54:15Z | 2021-05-20T06:54:15Z | CONTRIBUTOR | That seems insufficient: ```pytb _____ testpush_dask ______ [gw3] linux -- Python 3.9.5 /usr/bin/python3 @requires_dask @requires_bottleneck def test_push_dask(): import bottleneck import dask.array
/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/array/core.py:1476: in array x = self.compute() /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/base.py:285: in compute (result,) = compute(self, traverse=False, kwargs) /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/base.py:567: in compute results = schedule(dsk, keys, kwargs) /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/local.py:560: in get_sync return get_async( /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/local.py:503: in get_async for key, res_info, failed in queue_get(queue).result(): /usr/lib64/python3.9/concurrent/futures/_base.py:438: in result return self.get_result() /usr/lib64/python3.9/concurrent/futures/_base.py:390: in __get_result raise self._exception /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/local.py:545: in submit fut.set_result(fn(args, kwargs)) /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/local.py:237: in batch_execute_tasks return [execute_task(a) for a in it] /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/local.py:237: in <listcomp> return [execute_task(a) for a in it] /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/local.py:228: in execute_task result = pack_exception(e, dumps) /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/local.py:223: in execute_task result = _execute_task(task, data) /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/core.py:121: in _execute_task return func((_execute_task(a, cache) for a in args)) /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/optimization.py:963: in __call return core.get(self.dsk, self.outkey, dict(zip(self.inkeys, args))) /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/core.py:151: in get result = _execute_task(task, cache) /usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/dask/core.py:121: in _execute_task return func(*(_execute_task(a, cache) for a in args)) func = <built-in function push>, args = [array([nan, 1.])] kwargs = {'axis': 0, 'n': None} def apply(func, args, kwargs=None): if kwargs:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_push_dask fails type inference 895202415 | |
787516696 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4947#issuecomment-787516696 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4947 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NzUxNjY5Ng== | QuLogic 302469 | 2021-02-28T20:23:52Z | 2021-02-28T20:23:52Z | CONTRIBUTOR | It's not migrated yet; the 3.4.0rc1 prerelease is on PyPI now. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
⚠️ Nightly upstream-dev CI failed ⚠️ 814963352 | |
787407436 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4947#issuecomment-787407436 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4947 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4NzQwNzQzNg== | QuLogic 302469 | 2021-02-28T07:09:53Z | 2021-02-28T07:09:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
This comes from https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/pull/17830, as |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
⚠️ Nightly upstream-dev CI failed ⚠️ 814963352 | |
604139693 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3274#issuecomment-604139693 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3274 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwNDEzOTY5Mw== | QuLogic 302469 | 2020-03-25T23:20:18Z | 2020-03-25T23:20:18Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @pep8speaks seems a little broken... Line 328 is an empty line. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 1, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use drawstyle instead of linestyle in plot.step. 487746465 | |
603649349 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3274#issuecomment-603649349 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3274 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYwMzY0OTM0OQ== | QuLogic 302469 | 2020-03-25T05:32:25Z | 2020-03-25T05:32:25Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Done. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use drawstyle instead of linestyle in plot.step. 487746465 | |
596016815 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3274#issuecomment-596016815 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3274 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU5NjAxNjgxNQ== | QuLogic 302469 | 2020-03-07T00:13:29Z | 2020-03-07T00:13:29Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Sorry I lost track of this; I will rebase soon and update. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use drawstyle instead of linestyle in plot.step. 487746465 | |
535365202 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3274#issuecomment-535365202 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3274 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUzNTM2NTIwMg== | QuLogic 302469 | 2019-09-26T06:50:57Z | 2019-09-26T06:50:57Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Use drawstyle instead of linestyle in plot.step. 487746465 | |
526817968 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3266#issuecomment-526817968 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3266 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNjgxNzk2OA== | QuLogic 302469 | 2019-08-31T09:59:28Z | 2019-08-31T09:59:28Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Warnings in the test suite 485446209 | |
292432314 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1336#issuecomment-292432314 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1336 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI5MjQzMjMxNA== | QuLogic 302469 | 2017-04-07T04:26:02Z | 2017-04-07T04:26:02Z | CONTRIBUTOR | If slow tests are being run by default, I'm not sure they really need their own special option. You can mark them (with Are flaky tests actually flaky or do they just not work? If flaky, and a re-run will help, then maybe try the |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Marks slow, flaky, and failing tests 217660739 | |
284903466 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/535#issuecomment-284903466 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/535 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4NDkwMzQ2Ng== | QuLogic 302469 | 2017-03-08T00:12:19Z | 2017-03-08T00:12:19Z | CONTRIBUTOR | See #1298, where I changed Python 2.7 CI to install |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
test_cross_engine_read_write_netcdf4 is broken on Python 3 due to some sort of upstream change 101517700 | |
284903256 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1298#issuecomment-284903256 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1298 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4NDkwMzI1Ng== | QuLogic 302469 | 2017-03-08T00:11:07Z | 2017-03-08T00:11:07Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Oh, just realized there's a skip on Python 3, which links to #535. Apparently, this test is now broken on both Python versions. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
netcdf4/h5netcdf cross engine test broken on Python 2 212388758 | |
284879925 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1298#issuecomment-284879925 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1298 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4NDg3OTkyNQ== | QuLogic 302469 | 2017-03-07T22:23:55Z | 2017-03-07T22:23:55Z | CONTRIBUTOR | shoyer/h5netcdf#16 appears to be the upstream issue, but oddly, it seems to be reported against Python 3 when here it fails with Python 2. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
netcdf4/h5netcdf cross engine test broken on Python 2 212388758 | |
284837584 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1298#issuecomment-284837584 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1298 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4NDgzNzU4NA== | QuLogic 302469 | 2017-03-07T19:47:11Z | 2017-03-07T19:47:11Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Both |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
netcdf4/h5netcdf cross engine test broken on Python 2 212388758 | |
284684016 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1298#issuecomment-284684016 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1298 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI4NDY4NDAxNg== | QuLogic 302469 | 2017-03-07T10:34:04Z | 2017-03-07T10:34:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Fortunately, this does fail in the same way as it does for me locally. Since Python 3 works, I think this might be a bytes/str thing, but the error is a bit opaque to me. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
netcdf4/h5netcdf cross engine test broken on Python 2 212388758 | |
269549266 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1171#issuecomment-269549266 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1171 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDI2OTU0OTI2Ng== | QuLogic 302469 | 2016-12-28T22:11:16Z | 2016-12-28T22:11:16Z | CONTRIBUTOR | That does seem like a bug, but I'm not the one to ask. I'd file a bug and ping @efiring. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Fix tests for upcoming matplotlib v2 196278181 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 11