issue_comments
11 rows where user = 2599958 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: issue_url, reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- hetland · 11 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1412254964 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7486#issuecomment-1412254964 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7486 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85ULUz0 | hetland 2599958 | 2023-02-01T15:30:32Z | 2023-02-01T15:30:32Z | NONE | In terms of maintenance burden, I would say that the future of the THREDDS server is uncertain. I am no longer at TAMU, so no longer in charge of keeping it up. And there are other issues that may make it difficult to keep up, even in the near term. So, I think relying on the accessability of this particular dataset even in the near term is not a good idea, unfortunately. |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible 1562408536 | |
1412165245 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7486#issuecomment-1412165245 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7486 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85UK-59 | hetland 2599958 | 2023-02-01T14:37:22Z | 2023-02-01T14:37:22Z | NONE | So, that bit of code that references the THREDDS server was just to explain how the (heavily subsetted) data was processed and put into the xarray example datasets. It's not necessary for the example to run, though it could be interesting. I have three solutions, roughly in order of my preference:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Data linked from https://docs.xarray.dev/en/stable/examples/ROMS_ocean_model.html is unavaible 1562408536 | |
631670146 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4085#issuecomment-631670146 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4085 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzMTY3MDE0Ng== | hetland 2599958 | 2020-05-20T19:11:56Z | 2020-05-20T19:11:56Z | NONE | The problem was only with very large arrays, so difficult to reproduce here. Fortunately, when I just now updated to the very latest xarray/dask, the problem seems to have gone away. I was puzzled because things worked fine -- as expected -- but only for smaller arrays. I will close this issue. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
lazy evaluation of large arrays fails 621968474 | |
561850225 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3441#issuecomment-561850225 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3441 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU2MTg1MDIyNQ== | hetland 2599958 | 2019-12-04T21:37:03Z | 2019-12-04T21:37:03Z | NONE | Looks like it was an easy fix. Thanks! I'll check it out soon. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
fix plotting with transposed nondim coords. 511668854 | |
524375694 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3116#issuecomment-524375694 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNDM3NTY5NA== | hetland 2599958 | 2019-08-23T16:18:04Z | 2019-08-23T16:18:04Z | NONE | I was wondering why the checksum kept failing. I'm glad that it's fixed now. On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 9:11 AM Deepak Cherian notifications@github.com wrote:
-- Prof. Rob Hetland Texas A&M Univ. – Dept. of Oceanography http://pong.tamu.edu/~rob |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added ROMS ocean model example notebook 467768201 | |
517819281 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3116#issuecomment-517819281 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxNzgxOTI4MQ== | hetland 2599958 | 2019-08-02T19:32:34Z | 2019-08-02T19:32:34Z | NONE | Hopefully these changes are all done now. I added my credit to 'Enhancements' instead of 'New functions/methods'; hope I guessed right. I didn't see any other examples of notebooks added. On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:24 AM Ryan Abernathey notifications@github.com wrote:
-- Prof. Rob Hetland Texas A&M Univ. – Dept. of Oceanography http://pong.tamu.edu/~rob |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added ROMS ocean model example notebook 467768201 | |
512608717 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3138#issuecomment-512608717 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3138 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMjYwODcxNw== | hetland 2599958 | 2019-07-17T23:42:27Z | 2019-07-17T23:42:27Z | NONE | I posted an issue to hvplot.xarray ( https://github.com/pyviz/hvplot/issues/244) where hvplot does not do the right thing. But matplotlib (and hence also xarray.plot) do the right thing. On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 6:40 PM Deepak Cherian notifications@github.com wrote:
-- Prof. Rob Hetland Texas A&M Univ. – Dept. of Oceanography http://pong.tamu.edu/~rob |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Plotting with 2d coordinates, error in transposed coordinate 469344355 | |
511937974 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3116#issuecomment-511937974 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMTkzNzk3NA== | hetland 2599958 | 2019-07-16T18:43:34Z | 2019-07-16T18:43:34Z | NONE | OK, I closed the other pull request, and updated this branch. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added ROMS ocean model example notebook 467768201 | |
511536035 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3116#issuecomment-511536035 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMTUzNjAzNQ== | hetland 2599958 | 2019-07-15T19:24:33Z | 2019-07-15T19:24:33Z | NONE | I'm having a hard time getting the docs to compile, they fail when loading the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added ROMS ocean model example notebook 467768201 | |
511260768 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3116#issuecomment-511260768 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3116 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMTI2MDc2OA== | hetland 2599958 | 2019-07-15T02:48:44Z | 2019-07-15T02:48:44Z | NONE | I'll try to get this done very soon. On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 8:33 PM Ryan Abernathey notifications@github.com wrote:
-- Prof. Rob Hetland Texas A&M Univ. – Dept. of Oceanography http://pong.tamu.edu/~rob |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Added ROMS ocean model example notebook 467768201 | |
511260354 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1503#issuecomment-511260354 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1503 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUxMTI2MDM1NA== | hetland 2599958 | 2019-07-15T02:44:54Z | 2019-07-15T02:44:54Z | NONE | To follow up with this, plotting using 'x' and 'y' kwargs works fine for now, even when the variable coordinates do not share the same number of dimensions. (i.e., a common case of plotting a cross section with sigma- or s-coordinates where the horizontal variable is 1D, but the vertical variable is 2D). So, I think this great, and should cover most use cases. The only approach I can think of to do this automatically would be to find variable coordinates that have matching dimensions. This would probably work in lots of cases, but unexpectedly break in others. I think I would prefer explicit over clever, unless we can think of a way to do it that won't break. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Plotting datasets with variable coordinates 248273793 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 6