issue_comments
5 rows where user = 10563614 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
user 1
- ghislainp · 5 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1264596449 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/7093#issuecomment-1264596449 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/7093 | IC_kwDOAMm_X85LYDXh | ghislainp 10563614 | 2022-10-02T09:37:47Z | 2022-10-02T09:37:47Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
xarray allows several types for netcdf attributes. Is it expected ? 1388326248 | |
831811778 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4489#issuecomment-831811778 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4489 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDgzMTgxMTc3OA== | ghislainp 10563614 | 2021-05-04T09:37:50Z | 2021-05-04T09:37:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR | yes, no problem, take your time. This is still a wanted feature in any case, I've recently needed it again. I've found a solution by converting the real index to integer after adequate scaling, but an integrated solution would be much better. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Alignment with tolerance2 715168959 | |
699548837 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4465#issuecomment-699548837 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4465 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5OTU0ODgzNw== | ghislainp 10563614 | 2020-09-26T21:15:44Z | 2020-09-26T21:15:44Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Interesting discussion #2217. As far as I understand, it solves a wider problem than using a tolerance on and a member by member comparison... but more complex to implement. Here is the simple solution that works for me (combine.py:70):
I've not tested in depth, I can make a PR, tests, doc if you agree with this solution. Regarding the name of the arg. "tolerance" is nice, but allclose has atol and rtol. My solution above only set atol, but both may be useful. Should we use: 2args: atol, rtol 2 args: atolerance, rtolerance 1 args: tolerance could be a number (->atol) or a tuple interpreted as atol, rtol = tolerance or a dict .... ? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
combine_by_coords could use allclose instead of equal to compare coordinates 709503596 | |
695834632 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3008#issuecomment-695834632 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3008 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY5NTgzNDYzMg== | ghislainp 10563614 | 2020-09-20T20:49:27Z | 2020-09-20T20:49:27Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The proposed PR completely rewrite how the Cartesian product is computed, MultiIndex.from_product is unable to deal with MultiIndex which was written for any iterables. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
to_dataframe/to_series fails when one out of more than one dims are stacked / multiindex 454106835 | |
658912550 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4228#issuecomment-658912550 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4228 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDY1ODkxMjU1MA== | ghislainp 10563614 | 2020-07-15T17:54:57Z | 2020-07-15T18:29:20Z | CONTRIBUTOR | thanks for the very clear response. The behaviro make sense. In fact, I should have explained what I'm trying to achieve, as this is kind of "take". I've a dict like this:
I've done that by iterating over the dict, selecting with sel using the dict values, convert to dataframe and then concat the dataframes. pd.concat([x.sel(**d[k]).to_dataframe() or k in d] A better option would be to do this "sel" or "take" with xarray only. Do you have an idea how to do it with existing xarray methods? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
to_dataframe: no valid index for a 0-dimensional object 657466413 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
issue 5