issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 809853736 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- memoryview is too large saving 1.77GB Array · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
781514156 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4918#issuecomment-781514156 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4918 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MTUxNDE1Ng== | conaghili 68662648 | 2021-02-18T17:35:45Z | 2021-02-18T17:35:45Z | NONE | upon looking around I needed to use June_ULCVarXr.load() before to_netcdf(). I think it was trying to use dask to write. So to make sure I tried .load(). Apparently it worked |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
memoryview is too large saving 1.77GB Array 809853736 | |
781487143 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4918#issuecomment-781487143 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4918 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MTQ4NzE0Mw== | conaghili 68662648 | 2021-02-18T16:56:12Z | 2021-02-18T16:57:16Z | NONE | So I tested saving a file without running it through dask Maybe it was trying to use dask to write the file???? I'm going to rerun the code with .load() before to_netcdf to see if that helps |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
memoryview is too large saving 1.77GB Array 809853736 | |
780934253 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4918#issuecomment-780934253 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4918 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MDkzNDI1Mw== | conaghili 68662648 | 2021-02-17T23:59:49Z | 2021-02-18T00:01:31Z | NONE |
The computer the data is stored on is undergoing maintenance tonight -- I'll get on it tomorrow morning to check! I'm more or less trying a way to handle large data and would love to solve this output error since if I get it working this would be a method I'd use on a lot of extremely large netcdfs moving forward |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
memoryview is too large saving 1.77GB Array 809853736 | |
780926683 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/4918#issuecomment-780926683 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4918 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MDkyNjY4Mw== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-02-17T23:41:11Z | 2021-02-17T23:41:11Z | MEMBER | The error does not tell me anything, could you try to open the data also with xarray. You'll need to do something along the lines of
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
memoryview is too large saving 1.77GB Array 809853736 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 2