issue_comments
3 rows where issue = 807764700 and user = 10194086 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at (date)
issue 1
- add typing to unary and binary arithmetic operators · 3 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
789898568 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4904#issuecomment-789898568 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4904 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4OTg5ODU2OA== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-03-03T17:13:08Z | 2021-03-03T17:13:08Z | MEMBER | Just FYI #4881 and #4878 are done |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add typing to unary and binary arithmetic operators 807764700 | |
779710237 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4904#issuecomment-779710237 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4904 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3OTcxMDIzNw== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-02-16T09:37:55Z | 2021-02-16T09:37:55Z | MEMBER | Thanks for your thought-out answer. That all sounds good to me.
So that works now? I remember vaguely that @max-sixty (?) had an issue with this pattern once.
I vote for
Yes, I think that's a problem of the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add typing to unary and binary arithmetic operators 807764700 | |
778842603 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4904#issuecomment-778842603 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4904 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3ODg0MjYwMw== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-02-14T21:12:02Z | 2021-02-14T21:12:02Z | MEMBER | Thanks for the PR & your work. I'll need some time to digest that all... One thing I certainly would like to fix before merging this is #4881 (and merge #4878). I'd also be interested in your motivation for the stub files. (It's just that we don't have any of these so far). I am sure you saw this comment: so there would be an argument to create mixin-classes*. Another motivation would be that currently (with the * Well I just realised that your stub files are kind of mixin classes...
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
add typing to unary and binary arithmetic operators 807764700 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1