issue_comments
12 rows where issue = 788398518 and user = 6042212 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset · 12 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
780127931 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-780127931 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc4MDEyNzkzMQ== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-02-16T21:26:52Z | 2021-02-16T21:26:52Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thank you, @dcherian |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 | |
779870336 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-779870336 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3OTg3MDMzNg== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-02-16T14:26:12Z | 2021-02-16T14:26:12Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Can someone please explain the minimum version policy that is failing ``` Package Required Policy Status aiobotocore 1.1.2 (2020-08-18) 0.12 (2020-02-24) > (!) (w) ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 | |
778353067 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-778353067 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc3ODM1MzA2Nw== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-02-12T18:06:49Z | 2021-02-12T18:06:49Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @raybellwaves , might I paraphrase to "this PR is useful, please merge!" ? |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 | |
769247752 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-769247752 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2OTI0Nzc1Mg== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-01-28T17:27:50Z | 2021-01-28T17:27:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I have decided, on reflection, to back away on the scope here and only implement for zarr for now, since, frankly, I am confused about what should happen for other backends, and they are not tested. Yes, some of them are happy to accept file-like objects, but others either don't do that at all, or want the URL passing through. My code would have changed how things were handled, depending on whether it passed through open_dataset or open_mfdataset. Best would be to set up a set of expectations as tests. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 | |
768393609 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-768393609 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2ODM5MzYwOQ== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-01-27T16:10:39Z | 2021-01-27T16:10:39Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Thanks, @kmuehlbauer |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 | |
768385226 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-768385226 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2ODM4NTIyNg== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-01-27T15:58:15Z | 2021-01-27T15:58:15Z | CONTRIBUTOR | The RTD failure appears to be:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 | |
768362931 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-768362931 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2ODM2MjkzMQ== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-01-27T15:26:57Z | 2021-01-27T15:26:57Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I am marking this PR as ready, but please ask me for specific test cases that might be relevant and should be included. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 | |
764649377 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-764649377 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2NDY0OTM3Nw== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-01-21T13:40:33Z | 2021-01-21T13:40:33Z | CONTRIBUTOR | (please definitely do not merge until I've added documentation) |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 | |
762858956 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-762858956 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2Mjg1ODk1Ng== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-01-19T14:04:05Z | 2021-01-19T14:04:05Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Next open question: aside from zarr, few of the other backends will know what to do with fsspec's dict-like mappers. Should we prevent them from passing through? Should we attempt to distinguish between directories and files, and make fsspec file-like objects? We could just allow the backends to fail later on incorrect input. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 | |
762394713 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-762394713 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2MjM5NDcxMw== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-01-18T17:52:47Z | 2021-01-18T17:55:19Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 | |
762367350 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-762367350 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2MjM2NzM1MA== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-01-18T16:54:21Z | 2021-01-18T16:54:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Question: should HTTP URLs be passed through unprocessed as before? I think that might be required by some of the netCDF engines, but we probably don't test this. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 | |
762350678 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-762350678 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2MjM1MDY3OA== | martindurant 6042212 | 2021-01-18T16:22:53Z | 2021-01-18T16:22:53Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Docs to be added |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Allow fsspec URLs in open_(mf)dataset 788398518 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1