issue_comments: 769247752
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4823#issuecomment-769247752 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4823 | 769247752 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2OTI0Nzc1Mg== | 6042212 | 2021-01-28T17:27:50Z | 2021-01-28T17:27:50Z | CONTRIBUTOR | I have decided, on reflection, to back away on the scope here and only implement for zarr for now, since, frankly, I am confused about what should happen for other backends, and they are not tested. Yes, some of them are happy to accept file-like objects, but others either don't do that at all, or want the URL passing through. My code would have changed how things were handled, depending on whether it passed through open_dataset or open_mfdataset. Best would be to set up a set of expectations as tests. |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
788398518 |