issue_comments
2 rows where issue = 787732195 and user = 10194086 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Add dataset line plot · 2 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
766687715 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4820#issuecomment-766687715 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4820 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2NjY4NzcxNQ== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-01-25T09:41:36Z | 2021-01-25T09:41:36Z | MEMBER | Not really. It just looked very drafty ;-) My inclination would be to not allow setting
I think that's fine. It's always possible to extend later. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add dataset line plot 787732195 | |
765023068 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/4820#issuecomment-765023068 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/4820 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDc2NTAyMzA2OA== | mathause 10194086 | 2021-01-22T00:12:08Z | 2021-01-22T00:12:08Z | MEMBER | This looks like a good start but is also still very preliminary so I converted to a "work in progress". |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Add dataset line plot 787732195 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1