issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 602256880 and user = 449558 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • amueller · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • [Proposal] Expose Variable without Pandas dependency · 1 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
615490533 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3981#issuecomment-615490533 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3981 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNTQ5MDUzMw== amueller 449558 2020-04-17T22:24:36Z 2020-04-17T22:24:36Z NONE

FYI the conversation on sklearn is far from resolved, and at this point I think the added pandas dependency is not what will keep us from using xarray. I think right now we're most concerned about sparse data representations (and I was considering asking you folks if you'd support scipy.sparse ;)

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   [Proposal] Expose Variable without Pandas dependency 602256880

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);