issue_comments: 615490533
This data as json
| html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3981#issuecomment-615490533 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3981 | 615490533 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYxNTQ5MDUzMw== | 449558 | 2020-04-17T22:24:36Z | 2020-04-17T22:24:36Z | NONE | FYI the conversation on sklearn is far from resolved, and at this point I think the added pandas dependency is not what will keep us from using xarray. I think right now we're most concerned about sparse data representations (and I was considering asking you folks if you'd support scipy.sparse ;) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
602256880 |