issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 554662467 and user = 5635139 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Add isort to CI · 5 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 579402650 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3721#issuecomment-579402650 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3721 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3OTQwMjY1MA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-01-28T19:00:31Z | 2020-01-28T19:00:31Z | MEMBER | Thank you @crusaderky |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add isort to CI 554662467 | |
| 579402585 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3721#issuecomment-579402585 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3721 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3OTQwMjU4NQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-01-28T19:00:22Z | 2020-01-28T19:00:22Z | MEMBER | Just in case my previous comments were unclear, I think we should merge this! (and then reassess if we get complaints, which I give ~20% likelihood) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add isort to CI 554662467 | |
| 578282643 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3721#issuecomment-578282643 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3721 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3ODI4MjY0Mw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-01-24T20:10:23Z | 2020-01-24T20:10:23Z | MEMBER | I know, I know :) Potentially we have different priors on whether people might get stuck on all the setup. I hope there's no one, and if there is we can decide what to do! |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add isort to CI 554662467 | |
| 578164337 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3721#issuecomment-578164337 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3721 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3ODE2NDMzNw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-01-24T14:57:25Z | 2020-01-24T14:57:25Z | MEMBER | Yes; I'm particularly thinking of someone making their first contribution, maybe without all the linters and tools locally, and getting stymied by a slightly incorrect import. Ofc the tool would have to respect |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add isort to CI 554662467 | |
| 578150860 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3721#issuecomment-578150860 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3721 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU3ODE1MDg2MA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2020-01-24T14:24:38Z | 2020-01-24T14:24:38Z | MEMBER | +0.2, and we can revert if people really complain. If there were a tool to autocorrect PRs (i.e. not just fail CI, but offer to add commits to correct the problems), that would be great |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add isort to CI 554662467 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1