issue_comments
7 rows where issue = 521887948 and user = 2448579 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Silence sphinx warnings · 7 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
555560903 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3516#issuecomment-555560903 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3516 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NTU2MDkwMw== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-11-19T15:31:33Z | 2019-11-19T15:31:33Z | MEMBER | I'm going to merge so we can get the docstring improvements out. Let's have a follow-up PR to fix the remaining warnings. Thanks for the great work @keewis 🍻 |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Silence sphinx warnings 521887948 | |
555289057 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3516#issuecomment-555289057 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3516 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NTI4OTA1Nw== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-11-19T01:28:14Z | 2019-11-19T01:28:14Z | MEMBER | :man_shrugging: I think it's fine to merge right now. This is great work! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Silence sphinx warnings 521887948 | |
555106174 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3516#issuecomment-555106174 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3516 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NTEwNjE3NA== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-11-18T16:53:15Z | 2019-11-18T16:53:15Z | MEMBER | Ok sounds good then |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Silence sphinx warnings 521887948 | |
555087906 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3516#issuecomment-555087906 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3516 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NTA4NzkwNg== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-11-18T16:14:22Z | 2019-11-18T16:14:22Z | MEMBER | Will it still fail of there are errors? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Silence sphinx warnings 521887948 | |
555076193 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3516#issuecomment-555076193 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3516 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NTA3NjE5Mw== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-11-18T15:50:10Z | 2019-11-18T15:50:10Z | MEMBER | I think so. Though would a decorator be cleaner? I'm pretty sure dask uses a decorator when they wrap numpy functions |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Silence sphinx warnings 521887948 | |
554812963 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3516#issuecomment-554812963 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3516 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NDgxMjk2Mw== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-11-18T01:24:13Z | 2019-11-18T01:24:13Z | MEMBER |
Lets do :ref:
Let's change these appropriately.
:+1: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Silence sphinx warnings 521887948 | |
554806634 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3516#issuecomment-554806634 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3516 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1NDgwNjYzNA== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-11-18T00:34:41Z | 2019-11-18T00:34:41Z | MEMBER |
Sounds good! |
{ "total_count": 2, "+1": 2, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Silence sphinx warnings 521887948 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1