issue_comments
14 rows where issue = 490316894 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas · 14 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
547996494 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547996494 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0Nzk5NjQ5NA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-10-30T16:33:37Z | 2019-10-30T16:33:37Z | MEMBER | Thanks @takluyver. And @Zac-HD for the feedback; v much agree with your approach |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
547932332 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547932332 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NzkzMjMzMg== | dcherian 2448579 | 2019-10-30T14:28:46Z | 2019-10-30T14:28:46Z | MEMBER | Opened #3468 . Thanks @takluyver |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
547837799 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547837799 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NzgzNzc5OQ== | takluyver 327925 | 2019-10-30T10:37:23Z | 2019-10-30T10:37:23Z | MEMBER | OK, I've xfailed it. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 1, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
541307157 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-541307157 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MTMwNzE1Nw== | pep8speaks 24736507 | 2019-10-12T09:36:03Z | 2019-10-30T10:01:17Z | NONE | Hello @takluyver! Thanks for updating this PR. We checked the lines you've touched for PEP 8 issues, and found: There are currently no PEP 8 issues detected in this Pull Request. Cheers! :beers: Comment last updated at 2019-10-30 10:01:16 UTC |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
547651559 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547651559 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NzY1MTU1OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2019-10-29T22:09:10Z | 2019-10-29T22:09:10Z | MEMBER |
+1 let's do that! |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
547646808 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547646808 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NzY0NjgwOA== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2019-10-29T21:54:35Z | 2019-10-29T21:56:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
In my experience it's better to open an issue, add an xfail decorator to the test, and merge the tests PR. Otherwise the initial PR can take a very long time and no other property-based tests get added. In this case I'd duplicate the test, so there's one which does not allow empty dataframes and one (xfailing) which does. It's also likely that the person who found the bug is not the best person to fix it, and requiring that they do so in order to merge a useful test just disincentives testing! |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
547588922 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547588922 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NzU4ODkyMg== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-10-29T19:23:07Z | 2019-10-29T19:23:07Z | MEMBER |
If we want to merge a subset of the tests then that's fine. Ofc even better if we can use these tests to find & fix the errors |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
547587564 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547587564 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NzU4NzU2NA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-10-29T19:19:28Z | 2019-10-29T19:19:28Z | MEMBER | You're right @takluyver It looks like hypothesis tests are running in the normal test suites. Anyone know offhand why that is? e.g. https://dev.azure.com/xarray/xarray/_build/results?buildId=1284 (that doesn't solve the test failure, though) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
547503432 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547503432 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NzUwMzQzMg== | takluyver 327925 | 2019-10-29T16:13:52Z | 2019-10-29T16:13:52Z | MEMBER | OK, looks like the test failure now is real. Let me know if you want me to comment out the relevant line so the tests pass. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
547458156 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547458156 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NzQ1ODE1Ng== | takluyver 327925 | 2019-10-29T14:48:52Z | 2019-10-29T14:48:52Z | MEMBER | Nope. I don't understand the error, though it looks like astropy has had something similar: https://github.com/astropy/astropy/issues/6424 Also black is now failing on a number of files not affected here. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
547453601 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547453601 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NzQ1MzYwMQ== | takluyver 327925 | 2019-10-29T14:40:05Z | 2019-10-29T14:40:05Z | MEMBER | Merged master, crossing fingers that fixes it. |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
547451344 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547451344 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NzQ1MTM0NA== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-10-29T14:35:37Z | 2019-10-29T14:35:37Z | MEMBER | This seems so close—could we fix the test (maybe that's just a merging of master?) and merge? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
540987510 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-540987510 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0MDk4NzUxMA== | takluyver 327925 | 2019-10-11T09:20:16Z | 2019-10-11T09:20:16Z | MEMBER | As in my other PR, one suggested addition causes a test failure, and I've put that in the last commit. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 | |
529197447 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-529197447 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyOTE5NzQ0Nw== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2019-09-08T12:20:34Z | 2019-09-08T12:20:34Z | MEMBER | This looks great! I'll let someone who knows hypothesis better do a full review. Thanks for submitting @takluyver ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Hypothesis tests for roundtrip to & from pandas 490316894 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 6