issue_comments: 547646808
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3285#issuecomment-547646808 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3285 | 547646808 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU0NzY0NjgwOA== | 12229877 | 2019-10-29T21:54:35Z | 2019-10-29T21:56:21Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
In my experience it's better to open an issue, add an xfail decorator to the test, and merge the tests PR. Otherwise the initial PR can take a very long time and no other property-based tests get added. In this case I'd duplicate the test, so there's one which does not allow empty dataframes and one (xfailing) which does. It's also likely that the person who found the bug is not the best person to fix it, and requiring that they do so in order to merge a useful test just disincentives testing! |
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 1, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
490316894 |