home / github

Menu
  • GraphQL API
  • Search all tables

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

2 rows where issue = 482023929 and user = 868027 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • DocOtak · 2 ✖

issue 1

  • Building the docs creates temporary files · 2 ✖

author_association 1

  • CONTRIBUTOR 2
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
525325332 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3227#issuecomment-525325332 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3227 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyNTMyNTMzMg== DocOtak 868027 2019-08-27T14:24:35Z 2019-08-27T14:24:35Z CONTRIBUTOR

Hi @gwgundersen some clarification on those "extra snippets", github is not aware of the ipython directive so it prints those out like code snippets. In the actual built docs, these don't appear (the :suppress: in that block does this).

I personally feel that the code that makes these temporary files should be responsible for cleaning it up, especially since it already tries, and they aren't build artifacts needed in other steps. I'd probably reach for the tempfile.TemporaryDirectory in the standard library and bracket the dask docs in a create, cd in, cd out, cleanup type flow. There is already a suppressed setup ipython block at the top of the dask docs too.

@max-sixty Any opinions on which option we should go for?

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Building the docs creates temporary files 482023929
522589729 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/3227#issuecomment-522589729 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3227 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyMjU4OTcyOQ== DocOtak 868027 2019-08-19T14:03:24Z 2019-08-19T14:03:24Z CONTRIBUTOR

The files and directories that were not cleaned up by the make clean command are all artifacts of the code examples which run in the docs themselves. For example, the manipulated-example-data.nc is created in this section.

At leas one of these files is cleaned up at the end, see the ipython block.

I'd probably look into something like a temporary directory rather than trying to track down all the "example artifacts" created during a run. I'm not sure what sort of configuration the IPython blocks have, but there are also some tempdir utilities in IPython.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  Building the docs creates temporary files 482023929

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 13.795ms · About: xarray-datasette