home / github

Menu
  • Search all tables
  • GraphQL API

issue_comments

Table actions
  • GraphQL API for issue_comments

3 rows where issue = 467908830 and user = 14808389 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • keewis · 3 ✖

issue 1

  • WIP: tutorial on merging datasets · 3 ✖

author_association 1

  • MEMBER 3
id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
637545516 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-637545516 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzNzU0NTUxNg== keewis 14808389 2020-06-02T13:33:31Z 2020-06-02T13:33:31Z MEMBER

@rabernat, I did the rebase for this and #3111, so when you eventually pick this up again, a simple merge should get this up-to-date with master

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  WIP: tutorial on merging datasets 467908830
630228624 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-630228624 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzMDIyODYyNA== keewis 14808389 2020-05-18T14:42:08Z 2020-05-18T14:42:33Z MEMBER

we should rebase this and #3111 onto master so we don't depend on the old scipy19-docs branch. If we want to continue having a separate development branch for documentation, I think we should use one that is kept in sync with current master.

{
    "total_count": 1,
    "+1": 1,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  WIP: tutorial on merging datasets 467908830
630209431 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/3131#issuecomment-630209431 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/3131 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDYzMDIwOTQzMQ== keewis 14808389 2020-05-18T14:13:06Z 2020-05-18T14:13:06Z MEMBER

err, sorry, no. That happened because I deleted the branch you tried to merge into. Let me try to fix that.

{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
  WIP: tutorial on merging datasets 467908830

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options:

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
Powered by Datasette · Queries took 749.185ms · About: xarray-datasette