issue_comments

Table actions

1 row where issue = 416962458 and user = 22542812 sorted by updated_at descending

✎ View and edit SQL

This data as json, CSV (advanced)

Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)

user 1

  • DerWeh · 1 ✖

issue 1

  • Performance: numpy indexes small amounts of data 1000 faster than xarray · 1 ✖

author_association 1

id html_url issue_url node_id user created_at updated_at ▲ author_association body reactions performed_via_github_app issue
529569885 https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2799#issuecomment-529569885 https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2799 MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDUyOTU2OTg4NQ== DerWeh 22542812 2019-09-09T16:53:20Z 2019-09-09T16:53:20Z NONE

It might be interesting to see, if pythran is an alternative to Cython. It seems like it handles high level numpy quite well, and would retain the readability of Python. Of course, it has its own issues...

But it seems like other libraries like e.g. scikit-image made some good experience with it.

Sadly I can't be of much help, as I lack experience (and most importantly time).

 
{
    "total_count": 0,
    "+1": 0,
    "-1": 0,
    "laugh": 0,
    "hooray": 0,
    "confused": 0,
    "heart": 0,
    "rocket": 0,
    "eyes": 0
}
   Performance: numpy indexes small amounts of data 1000 faster than xarray 416962458

Advanced export

JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object

CSV options: 

CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
   [html_url] TEXT,
   [issue_url] TEXT,
   [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
   [node_id] TEXT,
   [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
   [created_at] TEXT,
   [updated_at] TEXT,
   [author_association] TEXT,
   [body] TEXT,
   [reactions] TEXT,
   [performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
   [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
    ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
    ON [issue_comments] ([user]);