issue_comments
3 rows where issue = 341331807 and user = 10050469 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Add CRS/projection information to xarray objects · 3 ✖
| id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 405166458 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2288#issuecomment-405166458 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2288 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNTE2NjQ1OA== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2018-07-16T07:23:53Z | 2018-07-16T07:23:53Z | MEMBER | Correct me if I'm wrong, but from the xarray side it would already be enough if there is a way in xarray to have a special The solution currently is to store What could also be a possibility (without knowing how the internals would look like) is to have a registry of "special attributes" names which would always be preserved by xarray's operations. This registry would live in xarray and can be updated by downstream libraries and/or accessors. (xref: https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1614 ). [1] : my preference goes for a simple PROJ4 string |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add CRS/projection information to xarray objects 341331807 | |
| 405106421 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2288#issuecomment-405106421 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2288 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNTEwNjQyMQ== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2018-07-15T17:42:21Z | 2018-07-16T07:18:44Z | MEMBER | This has been discussed from time to time, although not in such an extensive way: thanks! For me, the long list of discussion points that you mention is a clear argument for a dedicated package which will have to solve all these issues. A good example of difficulty to tackle is the fact that geo libraries often do not use the same standards (see the incompatibility between Regarding the xarray side: I also brought this up for my own geo-lib a while ago, and it seems that the cleanest solution to carry a |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add CRS/projection information to xarray objects 341331807 | |
| 405113116 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2288#issuecomment-405113116 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2288 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNTExMzExNg== | fmaussion 10050469 | 2018-07-15T19:39:28Z | 2018-07-15T19:39:28Z | MEMBER | geopandas would be a great template for a geoxarray package ;-) |
{
"total_count": 0,
"+1": 0,
"-1": 0,
"laugh": 0,
"hooray": 0,
"confused": 0,
"heart": 0,
"rocket": 0,
"eyes": 0
} |
Add CRS/projection information to xarray objects 341331807 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] (
[html_url] TEXT,
[issue_url] TEXT,
[id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY,
[node_id] TEXT,
[user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]),
[created_at] TEXT,
[updated_at] TEXT,
[author_association] TEXT,
[body] TEXT,
[reactions] TEXT,
[performed_via_github_app] TEXT,
[issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id])
);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue]
ON [issue_comments] ([issue]);
CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user]
ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1