issue_comments: 405106421
This data as json
html_url | issue_url | id | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/2288#issuecomment-405106421 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/2288 | 405106421 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQwNTEwNjQyMQ== | 10050469 | 2018-07-15T17:42:21Z | 2018-07-16T07:18:44Z | MEMBER | This has been discussed from time to time, although not in such an extensive way: thanks! For me, the long list of discussion points that you mention is a clear argument for a dedicated package which will have to solve all these issues. A good example of difficulty to tackle is the fact that geo libraries often do not use the same standards (see the incompatibility between Regarding the xarray side: I also brought this up for my own geo-lib a while ago, and it seems that the cleanest solution to carry a |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
341331807 |