issue_comments
7 rows where issue = 303103716 and user = 12229877 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Starter property-based test suite · 7 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
374573132 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1972#issuecomment-374573132 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1972 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3NDU3MzEzMg== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2018-03-20T12:03:13Z | 2018-03-20T12:03:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
Merge away then! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Starter property-based test suite 303103716 | |
373545890 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1972#issuecomment-373545890 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1972 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3MzU0NTg5MA== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2018-03-15T22:41:20Z | 2018-03-15T22:41:20Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @shoyer & @fmaussion - I've just given up on the plotting tests as being more effort than they're worth. Are there any:
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Starter property-based test suite 303103716 | |
371796211 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1972#issuecomment-371796211 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1972 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3MTc5NjIxMQ== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2018-03-09T12:11:02Z | 2018-03-09T12:11:02Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @jklymak - I'm getting (I'm also getting Zarr errors, but I assume those will go away soon as I didn't cause them) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Starter property-based test suite 303103716 | |
371722392 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1972#issuecomment-371722392 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1972 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3MTcyMjM5Mg== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2018-03-09T06:05:46Z | 2018-03-09T06:05:46Z | CONTRIBUTOR | ...that also explains why I was having trouble reproducing the error, whoops. I'll see how it goes with those problems excluded later tonight! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Starter property-based test suite 303103716 | |
371689343 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1972#issuecomment-371689343 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1972 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3MTY4OTM0Mw== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2018-03-09T02:05:18Z | 2018-03-09T02:05:39Z | CONTRIBUTOR | @shoyer - that depends mostly on whether you want to run these tests as part of a standard run. A test-time dependency on Hypothesis is very cheap compared to the other dev dependencies, so I'd think more about the impact on eg CI resources than contributors. Upside is more power and coverage of edge-cases with odd data; downside is that they take a lot longer by virtue of trying hundreds of examples, and in this case also having to generate arrays takes a while (~log(elements) average via sparse filling). @tacaswell - I would be delighted to write a test suite like this for matplotlib! The only reason I haven't is because I thought it would be rude to report so many bugs that I don't have time to help fix. If we can get a group project going though I'd be very enthusiastic 😄
I didn't keep the exact tracebacks, but I remember seeing many come from overflow in tick spacing calculations. Again, happy to write a test suite and make more detailed reports upstream if people want to fix this - in which case let's open an issue there! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Starter property-based test suite 303103716 | |
371671971 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1972#issuecomment-371671971 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1972 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3MTY3MTk3MQ== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2018-03-09T00:26:13Z | 2018-03-09T00:26:13Z | CONTRIBUTOR |
You're welcome! Same questions as above though, plus "is there anything else you need in this initial PR?". If not, can we merge it
As much as I love matplotlib, it's a steaming pile of hacks and I want to avoid it more than I want it cleaned up 😥 (entirely because the process is dysfunctional, not the code) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Starter property-based test suite 303103716 | |
371403712 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1972#issuecomment-371403712 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1972 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3MTQwMzcxMg== | Zac-HD 12229877 | 2018-03-08T07:29:18Z | 2018-03-08T07:29:18Z | CONTRIBUTOR | Ping @fmaussion / @shoyer - would love your opinions on this, including high-value targets to test. (btw Appveyor had an internal error; build is otherwise green) |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Starter property-based test suite 303103716 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1