issue_comments
5 rows where issue = 295838143 and user = 1217238 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
These facets timed out: author_association, issue
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
370944391 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1899#issuecomment-370944391 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1899 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM3MDk0NDM5MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-03-06T22:01:04Z | 2018-03-06T22:01:04Z | MEMBER | OK, in it goes. Thanks @fujiisoup ! |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Vectorized lazy indexing 295838143 | |
364625429 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1899#issuecomment-364625429 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1899 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NDYyNTQyOQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-10T04:33:44Z | 2018-02-10T04:33:44Z | MEMBER |
OK, this is pretty clever. There are some obvious fail cases, e.g., if they want to pull out indices Also, we would want to avoid separating basic/vectorized for backends that support efficient vectorized indexing (scipy and zarr). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Vectorized lazy indexing 295838143 | |
364583951 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1899#issuecomment-364583951 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1899 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NDU4Mzk1MQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-09T22:10:43Z | 2018-02-09T22:10:43Z | MEMBER | I think the design choice here really comes down to whether we want to enable VectorizedIndexing on arbitrary data on disk or not: Is it better to:
1. Always allow vectorized indexing by means of (lazily) loading all indexed data into memory as a single chunk. This could potentially be very expensive for IO or memory in hard to predict ways.
2. Or to only allow vectorized indexing if a backend supports it directly. This ensures that when vectorized indexing works it works efficiently. Vectorized indexing is still possibly but you have to explicitly write I think I slightly prefer option (2) but I can see the merits in either decision. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Vectorized lazy indexing 295838143 | |
364573996 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1899#issuecomment-364573996 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1899 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NDU3Mzk5Ng== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-09T21:30:40Z | 2018-02-09T21:30:40Z | MEMBER | Reason 2 is the primary one. We want to load the minimum amount of data possible into memory, mostly because pulling data from disk is slow. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Vectorized lazy indexing 295838143 | |
364529325 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1899#issuecomment-364529325 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1899 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM2NDUyOTMyNQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2018-02-09T19:07:39Z | 2018-02-09T19:07:39Z | MEMBER | I figured out how to consolidate two vectorized indexers, as long as they don't include any def index_vectorized_indexer(old_indexer, applied_indexer): return tuple(o[applied_indexer] for o in np.broadcast_arrays(*old_indexer)) for x, old, applied in [ (np.arange(10), (np.arange(2, 7),), (np.array([3, 2, 1]),)), (np.arange(10), (np.arange(6).reshape(2, 3),), (np.arange(2), np.arange(1, 3))), (-np.arange(1, 21).reshape(4, 5), (np.arange(3)[:, None], np.arange(4)[None, :]), (np.arange(3), np.arange(3))), ]: new_key = index_vectorized_indexer(old, applied) np.testing.assert_array_equal(x[old][applied], x[new_key]) ``` We could probably make this work with |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Vectorized lazy indexing 295838143 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1