issue_comments
17 rows where issue = 279161550 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: reactions, created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError · 17 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
349772394 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349772394 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTc3MjM5NA== | jakirkham 3019665 | 2017-12-06T20:57:51Z | 2017-12-06T20:57:51Z | NONE | Given the recent turn in discussion here, might be worthwhile to share some thoughts on issue ( https://github.com/dask/dask/issues/2694 ). |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349765925 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349765925 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTc2NTkyNQ== | mrocklin 306380 | 2017-12-06T20:32:58Z | 2017-12-06T20:32:58Z | MEMBER | That seems sensible to me. It would also be a good way to ensure that XArray operations adhere to all of the dask.array checks.
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349763381 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349763381 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTc2MzM4MQ== | max-sixty 5635139 | 2017-12-06T20:24:08Z | 2017-12-06T20:24:08Z | MEMBER |
What do you think about using that in our tests, i.e. Or we could even check for a dask object in our own |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349630978 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349630978 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTYzMDk3OA== | mrocklin 306380 | 2017-12-06T12:52:56Z | 2017-12-06T12:52:56Z | MEMBER | In the dask library itself we solve this by creating our own |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349537178 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349537178 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTUzNzE3OA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-12-06T05:20:29Z | 2017-12-06T05:20:29Z | MEMBER | OK, I figured it out. We set I don't really have better ideas for how to test this, but it is reassuring that |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349452364 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349452364 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTQ1MjM2NA== | mrocklin 306380 | 2017-12-05T21:47:18Z | 2017-12-05T21:47:18Z | MEMBER |
It was just a guess. Something wacky is certainly happening though. I recommend copying my code from my last comment and running pytest on it either in the root directory or in |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349391827 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349391827 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTM5MTgyNw== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-12-05T18:13:18Z | 2017-12-05T18:13:18Z | MEMBER | I can remove all the mock related code from |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349151434 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349151434 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE1MTQzNA== | mrocklin 306380 | 2017-12-05T00:14:13Z | 2017-12-05T00:14:13Z | MEMBER |
I experienced some odd behavior when testing this within the XArray test suite This file would pass when within ```python import numpy as np import xarray as xr import dask def test_dask_reduction(): data = xr.DataArray(np.random.random(size=(10, 2)), dims=['samples', 'features']).chunk((5, 2)) result = dask.compute(data.mean(axis=0)) ``` I suspect some odd behavior around mock, but that's probably due to a general bias/lack of understanding of that module. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349151169 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349151169 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE1MTE2OQ== | mrocklin 306380 | 2017-12-05T00:12:38Z | 2017-12-05T00:12:38Z | MEMBER | See https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1760 for a potential fix |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349149824 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349149824 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE0OTgyNA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-12-05T00:04:46Z | 2017-12-05T00:04:46Z | MEMBER |
I still don't understand what actually went wrong here. It looks like we have test coverage for calling compute on an xarray.DataArray (see In [6]: import numpy as np In [7]: import dask In [8]: import dask.array as da In [9]: import toolz ...: x = xr.Variable('x', da.arange(8, chunks=(4,))) ...: y = xr.Variable('y', da.arange(8, chunks=(4,)) * 2) ...: data = da.random.random((8, 8), chunks=(4, 4)) + 1 ...: array = xr.DataArray(data, dims=['x', 'y']) ...: array.coords['xx'] = x ...: array.coords['yy'] = y ...: ...: assert dict(array.dask_graph()) == toolz.merge(data.dask_graph(), ...: x.dask_graph(), ...: y.dask_graph()) ...: ...: (array2,) = dask.compute(array) ...: ValueError Traceback (most recent call last) <ipython-input-9-4aaee405bed6> in <module>() 11 y.dask_graph()) 12 ---> 13 (array2,) = dask.compute(array) ~/conda/envs/xarray-py36/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/base.py in compute(args, kwargs) 334 results_iter = iter(results) 335 return tuple(a if f is None else f(next(results_iter), a) --> 336 for f, a in postcomputes) 337 338 ~/conda/envs/xarray-py36/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dask/base.py in <genexpr>(.0) 334 results_iter = iter(results) 335 return tuple(a if f is None else f(next(results_iter), *a) --> 336 for f, a in postcomputes) 337 338 ~/dev/xarray/xarray/core/dataarray.py in _dask_finalize(results, func, args, name) 607 @staticmethod 608 def _dask_finalize(results, func, args, name): --> 609 ds = func(results, *args) 610 variable = ds._variables.pop(_THIS_ARRAY) 611 coords = ds._variables ~/dev/xarray/xarray/core/dataset.py in _dask_postcompute(results, info, args) 551 func, args2 = v 552 r = results2.pop() --> 553 result = func(r, args2) 554 else: 555 result = v ~/dev/xarray/xarray/core/variable.py in _dask_finalize(results, array_func, array_args, dims, attrs, encoding) 389 results = {k: v for k, v in results.items() if k[0] == name} # cull 390 data = array_func(results, *array_args) --> 391 return Variable(dims, data, attrs=attrs, encoding=encoding) 392 393 @property ~/dev/xarray/xarray/core/variable.py in init(self, dims, data, attrs, encoding, fastpath) 267 """ 268 self._data = as_compatible_data(data, fastpath=fastpath) --> 269 self._dims = self._parse_dimensions(dims) 270 self._attrs = None 271 self._encoding = None ~/dev/xarray/xarray/core/variable.py in _parse_dimensions(self, dims) 431 raise ValueError('dimensions %s must have the same length as the ' 432 'number of data dimensions, ndim=%s' --> 433 % (dims, self.ndim)) 434 return dims 435 ValueError: dimensions ('x',) must have the same length as the number of data dimensions, ndim=0 ``` |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349149217 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349149217 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE0OTIxNw== | mrocklin 306380 | 2017-12-05T00:01:20Z | 2017-12-05T00:01:20Z | MEMBER | Also worth pointing out that this is likely the kind of bug that would have been caught with static typing On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 6:55 PM, Stephan Hoyer notifications@github.com wrote:
|
{ "total_count": 1, "+1": 1, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349148049 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349148049 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE0ODA0OQ== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-12-04T23:55:28Z | 2017-12-04T23:55:28Z | MEMBER |
Yes, this seems like a small win. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349145345 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349145345 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE0NTM0NQ== | mrocklin 306380 | 2017-12-04T23:43:05Z | 2017-12-04T23:43:05Z | MEMBER | Any objection to having the |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349144660 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349144660 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE0NDY2MA== | mrocklin 306380 | 2017-12-04T23:40:18Z | 2017-12-04T23:40:18Z | MEMBER | Here is the problem. It was just a silly typo. ```diff diff --git a/xarray/core/dataarray.py b/xarray/core/dataarray.py index 0516b47..263860d 100644 --- a/xarray/core/dataarray.py +++ b/xarray/core/dataarray.py @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ class DataArray(AbstractArray, BaseDataObject):
@shoyer any suggestions on comprehensive ways to test things? |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349141548 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349141548 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTE0MTU0OA== | mrocklin 306380 | 2017-12-04T23:25:43Z | 2017-12-04T23:25:43Z | MEMBER | While testing this I oddly learn that the following line makes this pass
|
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349139597 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349139597 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTEzOTU5Nw== | mrocklin 306380 | 2017-12-04T23:17:47Z | 2017-12-04T23:17:47Z | MEMBER | I'll take a look |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 | |
349134458 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/issues/1759#issuecomment-349134458 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1759 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0OTEzNDQ1OA== | shoyer 1217238 | 2017-12-04T22:54:47Z | 2017-12-04T22:54:47Z | MEMBER | I don't think you're doing anything wrong. This looks like a bug related to @mrocklin's recent addition of dask duck methods for xarray. Here are the values being passed to It seems like something is going wrong on the dask side: |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
dask compute on reduction failes with ValueError 279161550 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 4