issue_comments
4 rows where issue = 278325492 and user = 6815844 sorted by updated_at descending
This data as json, CSV (advanced)
Suggested facets: created_at (date), updated_at (date)
issue 1
- Indexing Variable objects with a mask · 4 ✖
id | html_url | issue_url | node_id | user | created_at | updated_at ▲ | author_association | body | reactions | performed_via_github_app | issue |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
351597414 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1751#issuecomment-351597414 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1751 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1MTU5NzQxNA== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-12-14T03:23:05Z | 2017-12-14T03:23:05Z | MEMBER | This looks good to me. I think it is ready to expose |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Indexing Variable objects with a mask 278325492 | |
351594432 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1751#issuecomment-351594432 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1751 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM1MTU5NDQzMg== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-12-14T03:00:34Z | 2017-12-14T03:00:34Z | MEMBER | Sorry for my late review. I will see later today. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Indexing Variable objects with a mask 278325492 | |
348853749 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1751#issuecomment-348853749 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1751 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0ODg1Mzc0OQ== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-12-04T03:45:48Z | 2017-12-04T03:45:48Z | MEMBER | Could you add more test coverage of the first commit? It would help other developers to follow the logic. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Indexing Variable objects with a mask 278325492 | |
348376506 | https://github.com/pydata/xarray/pull/1751#issuecomment-348376506 | https://api.github.com/repos/pydata/xarray/issues/1751 | MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDM0ODM3NjUwNg== | fujiisoup 6815844 | 2017-12-01T01:39:41Z | 2017-12-01T01:39:41Z | MEMBER | It is a great idea!
I previously raised #1553 for multidimensional reindex, but am still thinking how could we implement it.
I will look inside the code later, but I feel this should be exposed to the public.
In this case, what is the most consistent naming with the existing methods?
Agreed. |
{ "total_count": 0, "+1": 0, "-1": 0, "laugh": 0, "hooray": 0, "confused": 0, "heart": 0, "rocket": 0, "eyes": 0 } |
Indexing Variable objects with a mask 278325492 |
Advanced export
JSON shape: default, array, newline-delimited, object
CREATE TABLE [issue_comments] ( [html_url] TEXT, [issue_url] TEXT, [id] INTEGER PRIMARY KEY, [node_id] TEXT, [user] INTEGER REFERENCES [users]([id]), [created_at] TEXT, [updated_at] TEXT, [author_association] TEXT, [body] TEXT, [reactions] TEXT, [performed_via_github_app] TEXT, [issue] INTEGER REFERENCES [issues]([id]) ); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_issue] ON [issue_comments] ([issue]); CREATE INDEX [idx_issue_comments_user] ON [issue_comments] ([user]);
user 1